XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump, alt.politics.liberalism   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican   
   From: katt@gmail.com   
      
   On Fri, 21 Nov 2025 15:24:37 -0500,  Chris Ahlstrom says...   
      
   >   
   > George Washington wrote this post by blinking in Morse code:   
   >   
   > >   
   > > On Fri, 21 Nov 2025 07:00:11 -0600,  super70s says...   
   > >   
   > >> Senate Democrat Says Threats Exploded After Trump's Shocking Posts   
   > >> "We've had hundreds and hundreds, if not, you know, closer to 1,000   
   > >> threats," Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) told NBC News.   
   > >   
   > > Sedition is NOT to be taken lightly.   
   >   
   > It wasn't sedition, Einstein.   
      
   Then, what would YOU call it, faggot?   
      
   Treason?   
      
   Either or, stupid... either or... or BOTH!   
      
   Wait... the fact is, I CAN'T give any less a shit, what YOU think it is or is   
   not. That seems more like your opinion than fact.   
      
   Are you smarter than a fifth generation AI bot? Doubtful.   
      
   Answer:   
   If a politician tells a member of the military to defy the president's orders,   
   it can be considered several things, depending on the context and the specific   
   circumstances. Here are a few possibilities:   
      
   SEDITION: SEDITION is the act of inciting or encouraging rebellion or   
   resistance against a government, or urging citizens to disobey the law.   
      
   If a politician is telling members of the military to defy the president's   
   orders, IT CAN BE SEEN AS AN ACT OF SEDITION, as it could be interpreted as an   
   attempt to undermine the authority of the president and the chain of command.   
      
   Military disobedience: Military disobedience is the act of refusing to follow   
   orders or disobeying a superior officer. If a politician is telling members of   
   the military to defy the president's orders, it could be seen as encouraging   
   military disobedience.   
      
   Interference with military operations: Interference with military operations   
   is a serious offense that can compromise national security and undermine the   
   effectiveness of the military. If a politician is telling members of the   
   military to defy the president's orders, it could be seen as interference with   
   military operations.   
      
   TREASON: TREASON is the act of betraying one's country or sovereign, often by   
   aiding or abetting an enemy or attempting to overthrow the government. In   
   extreme cases, if a politician's actions are seen as an attempt to undermine   
   the authority of the president and the government, IT COULD BE CONSIDERED   
   TREASONOUS.   
      
   In the United States, there are several laws and regulations that govern the   
   behavior of military personnel and civilians in relation to the chain of   
   command and the president's authority. These include:   
      
   The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): The UCMJ is a set of laws that   
   govern the behavior of military personnel and provide for the prosecution of   
   military personnel who commit offenses.   
      
   The Insurrection Act: The Insurrection Act is a federal law that prohibits   
   inciting or engaging in rebellion or insurrection against the United States.   
      
   The Logan Act: The Logan Act is a federal law that prohibits private citizens   
   from engaging in diplomatic relations with foreign governments in a way that   
   undermines the authority of the president.   
      
   Ultimately, the specific charges and consequences would depend on the facts of   
   the situation and the applicable laws and regulations.   
      
   =============================================================================   
      
   "Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition   
      
   All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.   
      
   "Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has   
   been driven effectively insane due to their dislike of Donald Trump, to the   
   point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."   
      
   Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the   
   Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into three distinct phases or   
   stages:   
      
   "In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The   
   president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, as if 140 characters were   
   all it took to change the world."   
      
   "The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's   
   vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting solely of   
   hyperbole."   
      
   "As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from   
   reality."   
      
   The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk   
   opposition from liberals to anything and everything Trump does. If Trump   
   announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would   
   suggest he was up to something nefarious, according to the logic of TDS.   
   There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be   
   received positively by TDSers.   
      
   The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early   
   2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a punch line for late-   
   night comics and nothing more.   
      
   Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first   
   coined by the late conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer back in 2003.   
   The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in   
   otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay -   
   the very existence of George W. Bush."   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)