XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump, alt.politics.liberalism   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican   
   From: katt@gmail.com   
      
   I would, if I was as stupid as them.   
      
   Take 3 seconds and research your lies, moron.   
      
   =====   
      
   On Sat, 29 Nov 2025 08:51:51 -0800,  Rudy "TDS" Canoza says...   
      
   > Sirhan holds a green card, but that can be revoked for criminal behavior.   
      
   What	 an	 idiot.   
      
   Sirhan is in prison.   
      
   Why give him to Jordan, when we can treat him like the animal he is?   
      
   Hey you stupid fucking moron...   
      
   "According to various sources, Sirhan Sirhan's green card was revoked in   
   1974."   
      
      
   The New York Times: On October 22,1974, The shit standard in journalism, The   
   New York Times, reported that SIRHAN SIRHAN'S GREEN CARD HAD BEEN REVOKED.   
      
   The Washington Post: On October 23,1974, The Washington Post reported that   
   SIRHAN SIRHAN'S GREEN CARD HAD BEEN REVOKED.   
      
   "Sirhan: The Man Who Assassinated Robert F. Kennedy" by William F. Thomas   
   (1987) - This book provides a detailed account of Sirhan Sirhan's life and the   
   assassination of Robert F. Kennedy, including information ABOUT THE REVOCATION   
   OF HIS GREEN CARD.   
      
   =====   
      
   God DAMN!, you're an idiot.   
      
   When a green card holder is convicted of a crime and sentenced to prison,   
   their immigration status can be affected. In many cases, a conviction can lead   
   to:   
      
   Revocation of the green card: If a green card holder is convicted of a serious   
   crime, such as a felony, their green card can be revoked, as has Sirhan's.   
      
   This can also lead to deportation proceedings.   
      
   Deportation: If a green card holder is convicted of a crime, they may be   
   deported back to their country of origin.   
      
   However, it's not automatic that a green card holder will lose their   
   privileges if they go to prison. The outcome depends on various factors,   
   including:   
      
   The type of crime: Some crimes, such as minor misdemeanors, may not lead to   
   revocation of the green card. However, more serious crimes, such as felonies   
   or crimes involving moral turpitude, can lead to revocation.   
      
   The length of the sentence: The length of the sentence can also impact the   
   green card holder's immigration status. If the sentence is lengthy, it may be   
   more likely that the green card will be revoked.   
      
   The individual's immigration history: The individual's immigration history,   
   including any prior convictions or issues, can also impact their immigration   
   status.   
      
   In general, the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and the   
   Department of Homeland Security (DHS) have the authority to revoke a green   
   card if a holder is convicted of a crime. However, the process is complex, and   
   each case is evaluated on its own merits.   
      
   Some common crimes that can lead to revocation of a green card include:   
      
   Felonies: Conviction of a felony can lead to revocation of a green card.   
      
   Crimes involving moral turpitude: Conviction of a crime involving moral   
   turpitude, such as theft or fraud, can lead to revocation.   
      
   Drug offenses: Conviction of a drug offense can lead to revocation.   
      
   It's worth noting that each case is unique, and the outcome depends on various   
   factors, including the specific crime, the length of the sentence, and the   
   individual's immigration history.   
      
   =============================================================================   
      
   "Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition   
      
   All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.   
      
   "Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has   
   been driven effectively insane due to their dislike of Donald Trump, to the   
   point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."   
      
   Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the   
   Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into three distinct phases or   
   stages:   
      
   "In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The   
   president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, as if 140 characters were   
   all it took to change the world."   
      
   "The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's   
   vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting solely of   
   hyperbole."   
      
   "As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from   
   reality."   
      
   The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk   
   opposition from liberals to anything and everything Trump does. If Trump   
   announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would   
   suggest he was up to something nefarious, according to the logic of TDS.   
   There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be   
   received positively by TDSers.   
      
   The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early   
   2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a punch line for late-   
   night comics and nothing more.   
      
   Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first   
   coined by the late conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer back in 2003.   
   The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in   
   otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay -   
   the very existence of George W. Bush."   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)