home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   can.politics      Libs bitching about what they voted for      997,123 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 995,382 of 997,123   
   AlleyCat to All   
   Re: Rep Ilhan Omar Coworker Says SHE Cam   
   04 Dec 25 21:48:31   
   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump, alt.politics.liberalism   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican   
   From: katt@gmail.com   
      
   On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 18:37:09 -0800,  Alan says...   
      
   >   
   > On 2025-12-04 16:53, AlleyCat wrote:   
   > >   
   > > On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 16:16:14 -0800,  Alan says...   
   > >   
   > >> On 2025-12-04 15:42, AlleyCat wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>> "She's (Ilhan Omar) the one who came up with all this (pay to vote)"   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Ilhan Omar campaign staffers become precinct managers AND COUNT THE VOTES   
   > >>>   
   > >>> "Ilhan and this group, they spent a lot of money"   
   > >>>   
   > >>> "So, the people that work for Ilhan (0mar) are actually counting the   
   ballots,   
   > >>> counting the vote?"   
   > >>>   
   > >>> "They (Ilhan Omar's campaign staffers) become a manager, in the precinct   
   too."   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Somalians who don't speak English are also told out how to vote   
   > >>>   
   > >>> "They walk with you to the booth and then they vote. Oh, vote this guy,   
   vote   
   > >>> this guy, vote this guy. Vote - even if you speak English."   
   > >>>   
   > >>> They are on camera in this video paying people $200-$800 per vote and   
   telling   
   > >>> them how to fill out the ballots   
   > >>>   
   > >>> https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1996480226399031297/   
   id/avc1/1280x720/Gi   
   > >>> O0rDt1IqDBf9p6.mp4   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Cue the deniers who say the video is fake, because James O'Keefe is   
   involved.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> PROVE the video is fake.   
   > >   
   > >> That's not the way it works.   
   > >   
   > > Mmmm... yes, it is.   
   > >   
   > > The video is the proof.   
   >   
   > Nope.   
      
   Yup.   
      
   Tell us, Mr. Know-It-None... how do you prove a video you took is real and not   
   fake?   
      
   > >   
   > > Prove it's fake.   
   > >   
   > >> ...there's no proof that the words that we're hearing are the words   
   > >> they're showing.   
   > >   
   > > Prove they're wrong.   
   > >   
   > > There are plenty of video Somali to English translators out there... USE   
   one,   
   > > lazy fuck.   
   > >   
   > > I noticed you never SAID it was fake, so it MUST be true.   
      
   > That's not the way THAT works either.   
      
   What a chicken-shit cock-sucker.   
      
   Who said what YOU think is how it works?   
      
   Prosecution goes first, moron, and YOU are the one accusing something of being   
   fake, no matter if you said it or not.   
      
   By your stupid argument, you are implying that it could be fake, but since   
   you're too chicken-shit to actually write those words... the video is true.   
      
   And that IS how it works, pussy boy.   
      
      
   Assertions have a presumption of truth: When someone makes an assertion, it's   
   assumed to be true unless there's evidence to the contrary.   
      
   Do you have evidence to the contrary?   
      
   Nope.   
      
   Burden of proof lies with the skeptic: THE SKEPTIC HAS THE BURDEN OF PROOF to   
   demonstrate that the assertion is false.   
      
   Practical Application   
      
   In practical terms, this means that:   
      
   The poster presents their claim: The poster presents their video.   
      
   The skeptic challenges the claim: The skeptic expresses doubts about the   
   video's authenticity and challenges the poster's claim.   
      
   The skeptic provides evidence: The skeptic provides evidence to support their   
   doubts, such as counter-evidence or logical arguments.   
      
   And that IS how it works, pussy rich boy.   
      
   =============================================================================   
      
   "Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition   
      
   All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.   
      
   "Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has   
   been driven effectively insane due to their dislike of Donald Trump, to the   
   point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."   
      
   Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the   
   Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into three distinct phases or   
   stages:   
      
   "In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The   
   president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, as if 140 characters were   
   all it took to change the world."   
      
   "The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's   
   vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting solely of   
   hyperbole."   
      
   "As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from   
   reality."   
      
   The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk   
   opposition from liberals to anything and everything Trump does. If Trump   
   announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would   
   suggest he was up to something nefarious, according to the logic of TDS.   
   There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be   
   received positively by TDSers.   
      
   The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early   
   2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a punch line for late-   
   night comics and nothing more.   
      
   Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first   
   coined by the late conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer back in 2003.   
   The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in   
   otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay -   
   the very existence of George W. Bush."   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca