Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.politics    |    Libs bitching about what they voted for    |    997,123 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 995,440 of 997,123    |
|    AlleyCat to All    |
|    President Barack Hussien Signed "The Aff    |
|    08 Dec 25 15:56:08    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump, alt.politics.liberalism       XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican       From: katt@gmail.com              On Mon, 08 Dec 2025 17:42:00 +0000, Lee says...              > Trump says he'll sign an executive order       > restricting states' ability to regulate AI       > Dec 8              Has any President ever signed into law, a national law, something that would       prohibit states from passing their own laws on the subject?              =====              The Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act of 1965, signed into law by       President Lyndon B. Johnson, prohibited states from regulating cigarette       labeling and advertising.              The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), signed into law       by President Gerald Ford, preempted state laws that relate to employee benefit       plans.              The Federal Meat Inspection Act of 1906, signed into law by President Theodore       Roosevelt, prohibited states from regulating meat inspection.              The Airline Deregulation Act of 1978, signed into law by President Jimmy       Carter, completely preempted state laws regulating airline routes, rates, and       services.              The Federal Communications Act of 1934, signed into law by President Franklin       D. Roosevelt, which gave the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) broad       authority to regulate interstate and foreign communications, effectively       preempting state laws.              =====              So... when Barack Obama did this... it was OK?              One law for all 50 states.              =====              Another notable instance is the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act       (ACA), also known as Obamacare, which President Barack Obama signed into law       on March 23,2010.              The ACA included a provision, known as the 'minimum coverage provision" or the       "individual mandate," which required individuals to purchase health insurance       or face a penalty.              The ACA ALSO INCLUDED A PROVISION THAT PROHIBITED STATES FROM PASSING THEIR       OWN LAWS that would exempt residents from the individual mandate.              Another example is the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection       Act of 2010              The Dodd-Frank Act preempted state laws regarding some consumer financial       products.              --       alt.fan.rush-       limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.       democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican       ==============================================================================       =              "Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition              All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.              "Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has       been driven effectively insane due to their dislike of Donald Trump, to the       point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."              Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the       Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into three distinct phases or       stages:              "In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The       president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, as if 140 characters were       all it took to change the world."              "The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's       vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting solely of       hyperbole."              "As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from       reality."              The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk       opposition from liberals to anything and everything Trump does. If Trump       announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would       suggest he was up to something nefarious, according to the logic of TDS.       There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be       received positively by TDSers.              The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early       2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a punch line for late-       night comics and nothing more.              Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first       coined by the late conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer back in 2003.       The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in       otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay -       the very existence of George W. Bush."              Added Krauthammer:              "Some clinicians consider this delusion - that Americans can only get their       news from one part of the political spectrum - the gravest of all. They report       that no matter how many times sufferers in padded cells are presented with       flash cards with the symbols ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, NPR, PBS, Time,       Newsweek, New York Times, Washington Post, L.A. Times - they remain       unresponsive, some in a terrifying near-catatonic torpor."              (If you don't realize the idea of TDS or BDS is - in no small part - meant in       a tongue-in-cheek manner then, well, you may well have it.)              Trump allies believe that TDS is worse than ODS or BDS - by a lot. Wrote       conservative pundit Bernie Goldberg on Real Clear Politics in early 2017:              "Before the election, the victims of TDS routinely compared Donald Trump to       Hitler. Guess what. They're still doing it. Articles in respectable       publications written by professors at elite universities are warning us to be       on guard, that a Trump presidency could imperil democracy-as-we-know-it and       may very well spell doom for American civilization.              "On election night, as it became obvious that their worst nightmare was about       to come true, some libs fainted. Some vomited. Many more threatened to leave       the country, but I'm pretty sure none actually did. As Donald Trump might say       in a tweet: so sad!"              The truth is that TDS is just the preferred nomenclature of Trump defenders       who view those who oppose him and his policies as nothing more than the blind       hatred of those who preach tolerance and free speech. Viewed more broadly, the       rise of presidential derangement syndromes is a function of increased       polarization - not to mention our national self-sorting - at work in the       country today.              We no longer live around, work around or pal around with people who think any       differently than us. We watch cable news that affirms what we already think.       We read ideological "news" sites that tell us how good our side is and how bad       the other one is. And on and on and on.              Is it any wonder then that we are increasingly willing to lump those who       disagree with us into the "deranged" category? To say that those who don't       share our views are mentally deficient in some way?                     [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca