Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.politics    |    Libs bitching about what they voted for    |    997,123 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 995,476 of 997,123    |
|    AlleyCat to All    |
|    Re: All We Need To Read, Before Coming T    |
|    09 Dec 25 21:04:23    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump, alt.politics.liberalism       XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican       From: katt@gmail.com              On Tue, 9 Dec 2025 18:46:12 -0800, Alan says...              >       > On 2025-12-09 18:44, AlleyCat wrote:       > >       > > On Tue, 9 Dec 2025 18:34:26 -0800, Alan says...       > >       > >>       > >> On 2025-12-09 17:00, AlleyCat wrote:       > >>>       > >>> On Tue, 9 Dec 2025 17:22:23 -0600, super70s says...       > >>>       > >>>> one unnamed Trump adviser       > >>>       > >>> Fake news.       > >>>       > >>> ONLY when you can name your source, does it become something else other       than       > >>> fake news.       > >       > >> And yet you make claims based on no source of any kind!       > >       > > Yes.              > So you're a hypocrite and proud of it!              I NEVER use "unnamed" sources, so... no.              I use sources that are EASILY looked up. Just because you faggot liberals       pretend to not look them up yourselves...              We know you do... that's why you come back with that lame bullshit of asking       us for sources.              LOL... we all know what you're doing.              Faggot liberals use sources who use "unnamed" sources, and they can't be       readily looked up, so there's no commonality with what I do and what these       faggot liberals do.              How would YOU look up an "unnamed" source?              Asking a search engine to look up which "unnamed" Trump advisor said this or       that, is a little different than asking it something that's a "known".              Right?              Right.              You can go on asking for sources. I can't give less of a shit, as long as I       know you've already looked for it and FOUND it and are asking for sources just       to play your little faggot games.              You whine about me not "sourcing".              Where's your whine for super70s?              YOU are the hypocrite, faggot.              =============================================================================              "Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition              All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.              "Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has       been driven effectively insane due to their dislike of Donald Trump, to the       point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."              Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the       Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into three distinct phases or       stages:              "In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The       president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, as if 140 characters were       all it took to change the world."              "The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's       vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting solely of       hyperbole."              "As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from       reality."              The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk       opposition from liberals to anything and everything Trump does. If Trump       announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would       suggest he was up to something nefarious, according to the logic of TDS.       There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be       received positively by TDSers.              The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early       2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a punch line for late-       night comics and nothing more.              Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first       coined by the late conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer back in 2003.       The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in       otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay -       the very existence of George W. Bush."              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca