319f9611   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump, alt.politics.liberalism   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican   
   From: katt@gmail.com   
      
   On Wed, 17 Dec 2025 16:26:00 +0000,  Lee says...   
      
      
   >  the Department?s jurisdiction do not   
   > > >> > contain descriptions, depictions, or other   
   > > >> > content that inappropriately disparage   
   > > >> > Americans past or living ? and instead   
   > > >> > focus on the greatness of the achievements   
   > > >> > and progress of the American people.?   
      
   You'd rather shame people than show how the people who were the victims   
   overcame whatever they were the victims of?   
      
   > > >> Yeah we certainly should put out monuments to shame people.   
      
   > > >    Internment camps happened.   
      
   Do I need to remind you of the brutality from the Japanese in which American   
   soldiers were subject to?   
      
   Do you think any Americans living in Japan were "spared"?   
      
   Were the Internment Camps a Japanese only thing? Nope. Was it REALLY that   
   "wrong" to hold people from the countries in which we were at war? No.   
      
   Do they teach THIS in your White Guilt Diaries?   
      
   Italians:   
   About 600 Italian Americans were interned during WWII, mostly due to suspected   
   ties to the Italian government or fascist organizations.   
   Some Italian Americans were detained for questioning or suspected subversive   
   activities, but most were released after a short period.   
      
   Germans:   
   Around 4,000 German Americans were interned during WWII, often due to   
   suspected ties to the German government or Nazi organizations.   
   Some German Americans were detained for questioning or suspected subversive   
   activities, but most were released after a short period.   
      
   > > > The Trail of Tears happened.   
      
   Yes, and those things ARE mentioned in History books, but always with the   
   "inappropriate disparagements" against White People.   
      
   They can teach that without the commentary and shaming.   
      
   "African Americans, both free and enslaved, played a significant role in the   
   Trail of Tears."   
      
   Do they teach THAT?   
      
   Were the Indians totally innocent of any wrongdoings? Hardly.   
      
   Do they teach THIS?   
      
   Many Cherokee, Muscogee (Creek), Seminole, Chickasaw, and Choctaw tribes OWNED   
   ENSLAVED AFRICANS, who were forcibly relocated alongside their Native American   
   owners. It's estimated that between 2,000 to 4,000 enslaved Africans were   
   forcibly moved during the Trail of Tears.   
      
   Indians owning slaves? Are they ever "inappropriately disparaged" in History   
   books, like Whites?   
      
   > > > Klan lynchings happened.   
      
   Can you show us where that's been eliminated from any text?   
      
   > > > Why do you oppose teaching the truth?   
      
   Black men, who are ~6.5% of the population, are guilty of murdering half the   
   people in America.   
      
   MANY American Indians are alcoholics.   
      
   Why do you oppose teaching THOSE truth?   
      
   They only want to shame Whites for what happened in the past with NO other   
   "truths" that went along with happened.   
      
   Why do you support the teaching of "truths" that are only meant to shame   
   people?   
      
   Why isn't having children out-of-wedlock or crime rates in the inner city   
   "taught"?   
      
   If or when anything is "taught" about minorities, it's always taught to shame   
   Whites for putting them in those predicaments, when the vast majority of White   
   people had/have NOTHING to do with anything in the past.   
      
   > > Was anything you mentioned banned?  Why do you continue to throw out   
   > > red herrings?   
      
   >   
   > "content that inappropriately disparage   
   > Americans past or living....   
   >   
   >   
   >    What does "inappropriately disparage" men?   
      
   Shame or embarrass them or make them feel guilty for something they never did,   
   JUST to make them feel bad and Blacks and other minorities good.   
      
   Does that REALLY need to be?   
      
   Why is it never taught that Blacks in Africa sold Blacks to Arabs and Muslims   
   to sell around the world?   
      
   Doesn't fit the narrative that all Whites are racists, and THAT makes for good   
   news stories.   
      
   =============================================================================   
      
   "Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition   
      
   All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.   
      
   "Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has   
   been driven effectively insane due to their dislike of Donald Trump, to the   
   point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."   
      
   Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the   
   Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into three distinct phases or   
   stages:   
      
   "In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The   
   president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, as if 140 characters were   
   all it took to change the world."   
      
   "The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's   
   vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting solely of   
   hyperbole."   
      
   "As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from   
   reality."   
      
   The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk   
   opposition from liberals to anything and everything Trump does. If Trump   
   announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would   
   suggest he was up to something nefarious, according to the logic of TDS.   
   There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be   
   received positively by TDSers.   
      
   The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early   
   2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a punch line for late-   
   night comics and nothing more.   
      
   Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first   
   coined by the late conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer back in 2003.   
   The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in   
   otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay -   
   the very existence of George W. Bush."   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)