XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.liberalism   
   From: katt@gmail.com   
      
   On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 08:27:48 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom says...   
      
   >   
   > -hh wrote this post by blinking in Morse code:   
   >   
   > > On 1/8/26 07:19, NoBody wrote:   
   > >   
   > >    
   > >> It's a clean and proper shoot.   
   >   
   > OMG!   
   >   
   > > No, the officer deliberately put himself in the path of a running vehicle.   
   >   
   > Partly. And then stepped aside.   
      
   Not even partly. He was off to the RIGHT of the SUV. The woman then backed up   
   and then drove towards the officer, whether she meant to or not.   
      
   You do NOT get a pass, saying you didn't mean to. Not when it comes to an   
   officer's life.   
      
   https://x.com/i/status/2008979613821903249   
      
   I had it wrong. All the videos I saw were of low resolution. I thought the   
   officer who was at the door, was the one who got hit.   
      
   > > Where do their TTP training procedures identify that as the correct   
   > > tactic? Cite the chapter & verse in its entirety.   
   >   
   > Stepping into the path   
      
   He did not step into the path. He was already there when she was parked,   
   blocking ICE.   
      
   Look again.   
      
   https://x.com/i/status/2008979613821903249   
      
      
   > and shooting, both against training and police procedure.   
      
   Can you show us these procedures?   
      
   > > A standards violation doesn't ever provide justification for escalation.   
      
   She ran him the fuck over. SHE "escalated" the incident.   
      
   > You misspelled "murder". Point-blank.   
      
   Yes, I know. She ran him the fuck over almost murdering the officer.   
      
   SHE "escalated" the incident.   
      
   =============================================================================   
      
   "Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition   
      
   All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.   
      
   "Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has   
   been driven effectively insane due to their dislike of Donald Trump, to the   
   point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."   
      
   Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the   
   Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into three distinct phases or   
   stages:   
      
   "In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The   
   president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, as if 140 characters were   
   all it took to change the world."   
      
   "The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's   
   vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting solely of   
   hyperbole."   
      
   "As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from   
   reality."   
      
   The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk   
   opposition from liberals to anything and everything Trump does. If Trump   
   announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would   
   suggest he was up to something nefarious, according to the logic of TDS.   
   There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be   
   received positively by TDSers.   
      
   The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early   
   2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a punch line for late-   
   night comics and nothing more.   
      
   Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first   
   coined by the late conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer back in 2003.   
   The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in   
   otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay -   
   the very existence of George W. Bush."   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|