XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.liberalism   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-09 05:24, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >   
   > On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 08:03:13 -0500,  -hh says...   
   >   
   >> No, the officer deliberately put himself in the path of a running vehicle.   
   >   
   > No, the officer who got hit was already in front of the vehicle when it was   
   > parked, then the woman back up and run into him.   
      
   That's false. He walked into that position as the vehicle was already in   
   motion.   
      
   >   
   > I had it wrong. All the videos I saw were of low resolution. I thought the   
   > officer who was at the door, was the one who got hit.   
   >   
   > Watch this video. You can't see the officer who got hit, until the woman   
   > backed up and then went forward, running him "over".   
   >   
   > https://x.com/i/status/2008979613821903249   
      
   Except that he wasn't run over at all and fired the shots from the SIDE.   
      
   >   
   > As you can see, the officer did not "deliberately put himself in the path of   
   a   
   > running vehicle."   
   >   
   > He was off to the RIGHT of the SUV. The woman then backed up and then drove   
   > towards the officer, whether she meant to or not.   
   >   
   > You do NOT get a pass, saying you didn't mean to. Not when it comes to an   
   > officer's life.   
      
   And you don't get to shoot at someone when you are no longer in any danger.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)