XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: NoBody@nowhere.com   
      
   On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 02:50:44 -0800, "chine.bleu"   
    wrote:   
      
   >super70s wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Why won't they let the body cam footage be shown?   
   >>>   
   >>> Why wouldn't local law work with ICE instead of turning   
   >>> their backs? Turnabout is fair play.   
   >>   
   >> Probably more interested in catching actual dangerous criminals instead   
   >> of the 74% ICEstapo detains with no criminal convictions.   
   >   
   >Minnesota can push this until it lands in state or federal court. Then   
   >ask the judge to issue subpoenas.   
      
   Laughter!  The Supremecy Clause is firmly established law.  Even the   
   liberal judges know there are no grounds to rule that way.   
      
   >   
   >It will be amusing to hear why this has to be kicked to federal court.   
   >And why DoJ can ignore subpoenas. Minnesota cannot force the DoJ and FBI   
   >to do their jobs, but at least Minnesota can get on the record under   
   >penalty of perjury why they are shielding a murderrer.   
      
   Did you know that Minnesota law supports the agent's reaction?   
      
   "   
      
   The legislature hereby finds and declares the following:   
      
   (1) that the authority to use deadly force, conferred on peace   
   officers by this section, is a critical responsibility that shall be   
   exercised judiciously and with respect for human rights and dignity   
   and for the sanctity of every human life. The legislature further   
   finds and declares that every person has a right to be free from   
   excessive use of force by officers acting under color of law;   
      
   (2) as set forth below, it is the intent of the legislature that peace   
   officers use deadly force only when necessary in defense of human life   
   or to prevent great bodily harm. In determining whether deadly force   
   is necessary, officers shall evaluate each situation in light of the   
   particular circumstances of each case;   
      
   (3) that the decision by a peace officer to use deadly force shall be   
   evaluated from the perspective of a reasonable officer in the same   
   situation, based on the totality of the circumstances known to or   
   perceived by the officer at the time, rather than with the benefit of   
   hindsight, and that the totality of the circumstances shall account   
   for occasions when officers may be forced to make quick judgments   
   about using deadly force"   
      
   https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/609.066   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)