XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.democrats   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-12 04:40, NoBody wrote:   
   > On Sun, 11 Jan 2026 13:45:35 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 2026-01-06 20:58, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>> On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 10:42:19 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >>>   
   >>>>> The REAL Russian colluder.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> https://imgur.com/FEK9fRC.jpg   
   >>>>> https://imgur.com/pIMc3DI.jpg   
   >>>>> https://imgur.com/ryQeewU.jpg   
   >>>>> https://imgur.com/pWbZPrK.jpg   
   >>>>   
   >>>> So simply being in public with Putin is proof...   
   >>>   
   >>> Yes.   
   >>   
   >> Trump's been in public with Putin.   
   >>   
   >> In fact, has held private meetings without any US interpreter present.   
   >   
   > Citation required.   
      
   I will provide them, but...   
      
   ...first you tell me that you actually don't know that to be true.   
      
   >   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>> ... of what exactly?   
   >>>   
   >>> If you don't know, which is fairly often... ask the lying liberals here,   
   when   
   >>> they accused Trump of collusion and being a Putin puppet in EVERY instance   
   >>> when Putin's name was mentioned.   
   >>   
   >> Doesn't answer my question.   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>> 'Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff, said Monday that   
   >>>> Greenland should be part of the United States in spite of a warning by   
   >>>> Frederiksen that a U.S. takeover of Greenland would amount to the end of   
   >>>> NATO.   
   >>>   
   >>> Miller didn't make allusions of a "takeover". Those are Frederiksen's   
   words.   
   >>  From two days ago:   
   >>   
   >> '“We are going to do something on Greenland whether they like it or not.   
   >> Because if we don’t do it, Russia or China will take over Greenland, and   
   >> we’re not going to have Russia or China as a neighbor,” Trump told   
   >> reporters at the White House while meeting with oil company executives.   
   >>   
   >> “I would like to make a deal the easy way, but if we don’t do it the   
   >> easy way we’re going to do it the hard way,” he added, appearing to   
   >> allude to potential military action.'   
   >>   
   >> "whether they like it or not".'   
   >   
   > "appearing to allude to potential military action" is the author   
   > interpreting the remarks.   
   >   
   > So...what Alleycat said was spot on and you're ducking.   
   >   
   > Again.   
   >>   
   >> What do you think he means by that?   
      
   So what do YOU think me meant?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)