home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   can.politics      Libs bitching about what they voted for      997,123 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 995,944 of 997,123   
   Skeeter to All   
   Re: NO ONE Is Talking About Taking Green   
   14 Jan 26 08:01:56   
   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.democrats   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10k7kl1$26go$1@solani.org>,   
   super70s@super70s.invalid says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-14 02:41:46 +0000, Skeeter said:   
   >   
   > > In article <10k6p9o$3cth$1@solani.org>,   
   > > super70s@super70s.invalid says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-01-14 00:27:37 +0000, Alan said:   
   > >>   
   > >>> On 2026-01-13 10:18, Aster Iske wrote:   
   > >>>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 09:10:59 -0800   
   > >>>> Alan  wrote:   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>> On 2026-01-12 08:57, Aster Iske wrote:   
   > >>>>>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 08:15:42 -0800   
   > >>>>>> Alan  wrote:   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> Fuck NATO.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> The countries that went to war with you?   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> That's nice.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> The countries that refused to poroperly fund their own defense   
   > >>>>>> treaty organization meant to keep them from the shackles of   
   > >>>>>> communism?   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> The ones that WENT TO WAR WITH THE US in Afghanistan.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Precisely as I stated.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> And Afghanistan was/is none of NATO's bidnits anyway.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Yet the US asked for and got assistance FROM NATO for it.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty:   
   > >>>   
   > >>> 'The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in   
   > >>> Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all   
   > >>> and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each   
   > >>> of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective   
   > >>> self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United   
   > >>> Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking   
   > >>> forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such   
   > >>> action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to   
   > >>> restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall   
   > >>> immediately be reported to the Security Council. Such measures shall be   
   > >>> terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary   
   > >>> to restore and maintain international peace and security.'   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Only ONE country has invoked Article 5 in the history of NATO.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Can you guess which one it was?   
   > >>   
   > >> NATO should be putting elite forces in Greenland and even Denmark for   
   > >> that matter right now in case Hitler Lite decides to kidnap their head   
   > >> of state and prosecute her with his corrupt DOJ.   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > You need a foil hat.   
   >   
   > "One way or the other, we're going to have Greenland." - The   
   > Trumpenfuhrer, 1/9/26   
   >   
   > "We're not going to have Russia or China as a neighbor." - The   
   > Trumpenfuhrer 1/11/26 (guess he's never heard of Alaska)   
      
   Who cares?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca