XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-14 16:16, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10k995q$8eb4$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com   
   > says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-14 15:33, Aster Iske wrote:   
   >>> On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 14:44:39 -0800   
   >>> Alan  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> 7. Authorized Officers/Agents shall not discharge their firearms at   
   >>>> the operator of a moving vehicle, vessel, or aircraft unless deadly   
   >>>> force is necessary, that is, when the officer/agent has a reasonable   
   >>>> belief that the operator poses an imminent danger of serious bodily   
   >>>> injury or death to the officer/agent or to another person.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> a. Such deadly force may include a moving vehicle aimed at   
   >>>> officers/agents or others present   
   >>>   
   >>> That covers it.   
   >>>   
   >>> Only traitors interfere with federal enforcement agents doing their job.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> "Imminent Threat Exception: The only exception where a federal agent can   
   >>> use deadly force, which could include shooting at or using a vehicle to   
   >>> stop another, is when the agent has a reasonable belief that the   
   >>> escaping vehicle or its occupants pose an imminent threat of death or   
   >>> serious physical injury to the officers or others, and no other   
   >>> reasonable means of defense or escape exist. In this specific scenario,   
   >>> the vehicle itself can be considered a deadly weapon."   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> The "escaping vehicle" posed NO THREAT AT ALL.   
   >   
   > It was sideways on the road. Stop being stupid.   
      
   It was executing a three point turn and she had already waved one   
   vehicle through...   
      
   ...just like ordinary people do every day.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)