XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.democrats   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10k95i1$8549$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com   
   says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-14 04:15, NoBody wrote:   
   > > On Tue, 13 Jan 2026 16:52:42 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> On 2026-01-13 04:50, NoBody wrote:   
   > >>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 08:16:32 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>> On 2026-01-12 04:40, NoBody wrote:   
   > >>>>> On Sun, 11 Jan 2026 13:45:35 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>> On 2026-01-06 20:58, AlleyCat wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 10:42:19 -0800,  Alan says...   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> The REAL Russian colluder.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> https://imgur.com/FEK9fRC.jpg   
   > >>>>>>>>> https://imgur.com/pIMc3DI.jpg   
   > >>>>>>>>> https://imgur.com/ryQeewU.jpg   
   > >>>>>>>>> https://imgur.com/pWbZPrK.jpg   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> So simply being in public with Putin is proof...   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> Yes.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> Trump's been in public with Putin.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> In fact, has held private meetings without any US interpreter present.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Citation required.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> I will provide them, but...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> ...first you tell me that you actually don't know that to be true.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> You made your claim, now support it.   
   > >>   
   > >> I will.   
   > >>   
   > >> Right after you tell me whether you actually believe I'm wrong.   
   > >   
   > > If you can't support your claim then just say so.   
   >   
   > I can support my claim.   
      
   You keep saying that...butttt   
   >   
   > >   
   > >>   
   > >> Or are you just too craven to take a stand?   
   > >   
   > > I'm withholding judgement until I see what you have to offer in the   
   > > way of proof.  That's how it's supposed to work.   
   >   
   > It's disingenuous to ask for proof of that which you already know to be   
   > true.   
      
   So you have no proof?   
   >   
   > I'm asking you to publicly declare yourself and you're refusing.   
      
   Huh?   
   >   
   > You're using more energy refusing than it would have taken to simply do   
   > as I asked...   
      
   And who are you?   
   >   
   > ...and that tells everyone all they need to know, doesn't it?   
      
   That you're an idiot? Why yes it does.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)