XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-14 15:30, Aster Iske wrote:   
   > On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 14:36:44 -0800   
   > Alan  wrote:   
   >   
   >>> Did you know that Minnesota law supports the agent's reaction?   
   >>   
   >> Did you know that the US Customs and Border Protection "Use of Force   
   >> Policy" doesn't?   
   >   
   > Only traitors interfere with federal enforcement agents doing their job.   
      
   Then Trump pardoned traitors...   
      
   ...the ones who invaded the Capitol Building...   
      
   ...and definitely DID attack federal enforcement agents just doing their   
   job.   
      
   >   
   >   
   > "Imminent Threat Exception: The only exception where a federal agent can   
   > use deadly force, which could include shooting at or using a vehicle to   
   > stop another, is when the agent has a reasonable belief that the   
   > escaping vehicle or its occupants pose an imminent threat of death or   
   > serious physical injury to the officers or others, and no other   
   > reasonable means of defense or escape exist. In this specific scenario,   
   > the vehicle itself can be considered a deadly weapon."   
   >   
      
   "and no other reasonable means of defense or escape exist."   
      
   One step to the right.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)