XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump
From: invalid@none.com
In article <10k9f9t$8eb4$9@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
>
> On 2026-01-14 15:35, Aster Iske wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 14:53:44 -0800
> > Alan wrote:
> >
> >> On 2026-01-12 10:22, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 08:36:06 -0800, Alan says...
> >>>
> >>>>> Oh look, it took you too long to respond Alan. You're dead.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> What "threat" is there in a vehicle that is driving away from you?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Other people in her path, you fucking moron.
> >>
> >> What people would those be? The video clearly shows she was about to
> >> depart down an open road.
> >
> > Sideways isn't "down an open road', liar.
>
> She was turning around.
How so you know?
>
> >
> > Only traitors interfere with federal enforcement agents doing their job.
>
> So all those who trespassed in the Capitol on Jan 6 were traitors.
Look at you spinning away again.
>
> Got it.
>
> >
> >
> > "Imminent Threat Exception: The only exception where a federal agent can
> > use deadly force, which could include shooting at or using a vehicle to
> > stop another, is when the agent has a reasonable belief that the
> > escaping vehicle or its occupants pose an imminent threat of death or
> > serious physical injury to the officers or others, and no other
> > reasonable means of defense or escape exist. In this specific scenario,
> > the vehicle itself can be considered a deadly weapon."
> >
>
> "and no other reasonable means of defense or escape exist"
>
> The shooter had the reasonable means of taking one step to the right.
Not your call.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
