XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-15 15:07, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10kbq1g$15km4$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-14 22:52, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>> On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 17:17:28 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >>>   
   >>>>> I wasn't open. She intentionally blocked. She then went   
   >>>>> into a telephone pole and not down the road.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Open in the sense that there was no other person in the road down which   
   >>>> she would have been driving.   
   >>>   
   >>> Road?   
   >>>   
   >>> https://i.imgur.com/OC9smu9.mp4   
   >>>   
   >>> https://i.imgur.com/Lfbiqwg.jpeg   
   >>>   
   >>> See those people standing thar, stoopit? WHAT are they standing on?   
   >>   
   >> Were any of those people in the direction she intended to travel?   
   >   
   > She was pointed towards the curb. Why?   
      
   Because she was in the middle of a three-point turn.   
      
   >>   
   >> No.   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> YOU, in your infinite stupidity, do NOT know, that Good was not going to go   
   >>> down and veer off onto a sidewalk.   
   >>   
   >> Why would she do that?   
   >   
   > She wouldn't. Until she got blasted.   
      
   Exactly. So the previous poster's position that the agent had to shoot   
   to PREVENT her from doing so is complete bullshit   
      
   Thank you!   
      
   >>   
   >> Your argument is about to be circular.   
   >   
   > Only in your little world.   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> Do you!?   
   >>>   
   >>> Nope.   
   >>>   
   >>> Law Enforcement always have innocent citizens in mind when dealing with   
   >>> whacked-out criminals like Good.   
   >> She was a citizen attempting to turn around and depart the area.   
   >   
   > You read minds now? Why did you ignore the video of her   
   > "wife" running around the car and taunting the agents?   
      
   What about it?   
      
   You don't know why she got out of the car.   
      
   >>   
   >> Do you assume that every citizen might "veer off onto a sidewalk", and   
   >> is that not, therefore, justification to shoot everyone who is behind   
   >> the wheel of a car?   
   >   
   >   
   > Now you are spinning to avoid. That was a stupid   
   > statement.   
   The stupid statement was that the "agent" was justified in continuing to   
   shoot because she MIGHT have been going to do those things...   
      
   ...and that was Loser (AlleyCat)...   
      
   ...not me.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)