Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.politics    |    Libs bitching about what they voted for    |    997,123 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 996,106 of 997,123    |
|    Skeeter to All    |
|    Re: For The Idiot In The House    |
|    15 Jan 26 16:49:22    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump       From: invalid@none.com              In article <10kbrvg$15km6$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-       uh@nope.com says...       >       > On 2026-01-12 21:38, AlleyCat wrote:       > >       > > On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 14:55:28 -0800, Alan says...       > >       > >>       > >> On 2026-01-12 10:22, AlleyCat wrote:       > >>>       > >>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 08:47:59 -0800, Alan says...       > >>>       > >>>>> Alan has run away.       > >>>>       > >>>> No. He hasn't and you know you're lying about it...       > >>>>       > >>>> ...because by the time you made this post (the one to which I'm       > >>>> replying), you'd already replied directly to me in another post       > >>>       > >>> "Running away" implies more than not replying, moron.       > >>>       > >>> You haven't proven a fucking thing, whereas everyone else has.       > >       > >> You haven't proven a thing, Loser.       > >       > > MOST people would list their proof, having taken the time to reply with       THAT       > > pansy-ass reply.       > >       > > But then again... MOST people aren't gay as fuck, so you CAN'T be included       in       > > "the most" crowd.       > >       > > Oh, and I HAVE proven my points. All your points are mind-reading bullshit.       > > You do NOT know what the agent was thinking, WHY he didn't use a body-cam,       > > that he might not have had, WHY was he videoing the car and the one       breaking       > > the law, and WHY he shot her.       >       > And you don't know what Good was thinking...       >       > ...but you make up fantasies that she had to be shot because her intent       > might have been to "veer" onto the sidewalk.       >       > >       > > All my points are FACTUAL... yours are your pwecious wittle feewings that       your       > > shit parents instilled in you, that that's all that counts.       > Your points about how long she was there, what her motivations were,       > what she was trying to do when she was moving forward...       >       > ...those are all pure speculation by you.              Neither do you so so stop acting like you do.       >       > What is not speculation is that the "officer" could have avoided even       > the possibility of contact by taking one step to his right.              You defend anyone who is for your far left agenda.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca