XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-15 21:56, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   > On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 03:14:15 +0000, Mitchell Holman    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >> Skeeter  wrote in   
   >> news:MPG.43d32e5ab2984fa998ab8b@usnews.blocknews.net:   
   >>   
   >>> In article <10kbt0p$15km6$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-14 22:07, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>> In article ,   
   >>>>> noemail@aol.com says...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Skeeter  wrote in   
   >>>>>> news:MPG.43d1df313a3f71e98ab02@usnews.blocknews.net:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> In article <10k96l8$8549$14@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-12 09:39, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 11 Jan 2026 23:16:44 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Both criminals.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> You aren't allowed to shoot at someone when they aren't a   
   >>>>>>>>>> threat.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Correct... I guess.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> But, no. (see bottom)   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Even if his first shot was when he was near the front of the   
   >>>>>>>>>> vehicle, his next two were from directly beside the driver's   
   >>>>>>>>>> door, and it was turning AWAY from him.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> And I've explained this, moron.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Law enforcement, after having been run over, plowed down,   
   >>>>>>>>> assaulted with a deadly weapon, vehicularly (Y, IK) assaulted,   
   >>>>>>>>> or any other term you might want to use   
   >>>>>>>>> here, usually shoot until the perpetrator is incapacitated or   
   >>>>>>>>> out of range, to keep the driver from doing any more harm to   
   >>>>>>>>> others or even themselves.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Except this officer was not "run over" OR "plowed down".   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> But he was hit.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> A threat is not "over" just because the vehicle has cleared the   
   >>>>>>>>> officer's path.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Yes, actually it is.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Who says? You?  LOL   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> If Good has already demonstrated her intent (which the officers   
   >>>>>>>>> did not KNOW) to use a vehicle as a weapon, they remain a   
   >>>>>>>>> 'deadly threat" until they are stopped. Turning "away" could   
   >>>>>>>>> simply be a maneuver to reposition for another strike or to   
   >>>>>>>>> flee at high speeds, endangering the public.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Her obvious intent was to leave the area and an officer with no   
   >>>>>>>> authority grabbed at her door, escalating the situation.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> No authority? He's a law officer you moron.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>      So were the Capitol Police that   
   >>>>>> Trump (and you) want to prosecute.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Like the one that murdered Ashley?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> She was breaking into a secure area and posed an immediate threat to   
   >>>> those the police were defending behind that door.   
   >>>   
   >>> They had guns and she didn't.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>     Just like Renee Good.   
   >>   
   >   
   >   
   > who weaponize her car.   
   Who was just trying to leave the area.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)