XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article ,   
   noemail@aol.com says...   
   >   
   > Skeeter  wrote in   
   > news:MPG.43d2aa6b768823bf98ab38@usnews.blocknews.net:   
   >   
   > > In article ,   
   > > noemail@aol.com says...   
   > >>   
   > >> Skeeter  wrote in news:MPG.43d231ff19568e9e98ab29   
   > >> @usnews.blocknews.net:   
   > >>   
   > >> > In article ,   
   > >> > noemail@aol.com says...   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> Skeeter  wrote in   
   > >> >> news:MPG.43d1df313a3f71e98ab02@usnews.blocknews.net:   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> > In article <10k96l8$8549$14@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >> >> > uh@nope.com says...   
   > >> >> >>   
   > >> >> >> On 2026-01-12 09:39, AlleyCat wrote:   
   > >> >> >> >   
   > >> >> >> > On Sun, 11 Jan 2026 23:16:44 -0800,  Alan says...   
   > >> >> >> >   
   > >> >> >> >>> Both criminals.   
   > >> >> >> >   
   > >> >> >> >> You aren't allowed to shoot at someone when they aren't a   
   > >> threat.   
   > >> >> >> >   
   > >> >> >> > Correct... I guess.   
   > >> >> >> >   
   > >> >> >> > But, no. (see bottom)   
   > >> >> >> >   
   > >> >> >> >> Even if his first shot was when he was near the front of the   
   > >> >> >> >> vehicle, his next two were from directly beside the driver's   
   > >> door,   
   > >> >> >> >> and it was turning AWAY from him.   
   > >> >> >> >   
   > >> >> >> > And I've explained this, moron.   
   > >> >> >> >   
   > >> >> >> > Law enforcement, after having been run over, plowed down,   
   > >> assaulted   
   > >> >> >> > with a deadly weapon, vehicularly (Y, IK) assaulted, or any   
   > >> >> >> > other term you might want to use   
   > >> >> >> > here, usually shoot until the perpetrator is incapacitated or   
   > >> >> >> > out of range, to keep the driver from doing any more harm to   
   > >> >> >> > others   
   > >> or   
   > >> >> >> > even themselves.   
   > >> >> >>   
   > >> >> >> Except this officer was not "run over" OR "plowed down".   
   > >> >> >   
   > >> >> > But he was hit.   
   > >> >> >>   
   > >> >> >> >   
   > >> >> >> > A threat is not "over" just because the vehicle has cleared   
   > >> >> >> > the officer's path.   
   > >> >> >>   
   > >> >> >> Yes, actually it is.   
   > >> >> >   
   > >> >> > Who says? You?  LOL   
   > >> >> >>   
   > >> >> >> >   
   > >> >> >> > If Good has already demonstrated her intent (which the   
   > >> >> >> > officers   
   > >> did   
   > >> >> >> > not KNOW) to use a vehicle as a weapon, they remain a 'deadly   
   > >> >> >> > threat" until they are stopped. Turning "away" could simply   
   > >> >> >> > be a maneuver to reposition for another strike or to flee at   
   > >> >> >> > high speeds, endangering the public.   
   > >> >> >>   
   > >> >> >> Her obvious intent was to leave the area and an officer with no   
   > >> >> >> authority grabbed at her door, escalating the situation.   
   > >> >> >   
   > >> >> > No authority? He's a law officer you moron.   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >>    So were the Capitol Police that   
   > >> >> Trump (and you) want to prosecute.   
   > >> >   
   > >> > Like the one that murdered Ashley?   
   > >>   
   > >>   
   > >>     Why isn't Trump prosecuting this "murder"?   
   > >   
   > > Not his job.   
   >   
   >   
   >      Then whose job is it?   
      
   Not his. Leave your TDS at home.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)