XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: MeanDog@Snarl.Dash   
      
   On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 22:12:18 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
      
   >On 2026-01-15 21:56, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 03:14:15 +0000, Mitchell Holman    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> Skeeter  wrote in   
   >>> news:MPG.43d32e5ab2984fa998ab8b@usnews.blocknews.net:   
   >>>   
   >>>> In article <10kbt0p$15km6$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> On 2026-01-14 22:07, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>> In article ,   
   >>>>>> noemail@aol.com says...   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Skeeter  wrote in   
   >>>>>>> news:MPG.43d1df313a3f71e98ab02@usnews.blocknews.net:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> In article <10k96l8$8549$14@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-12 09:39, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 11 Jan 2026 23:16:44 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Both criminals.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> You aren't allowed to shoot at someone when they aren't a   
   >>>>>>>>>>> threat.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Correct... I guess.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> But, no. (see bottom)   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Even if his first shot was when he was near the front of the   
   >>>>>>>>>>> vehicle, his next two were from directly beside the driver's   
   >>>>>>>>>>> door, and it was turning AWAY from him.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> And I've explained this, moron.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Law enforcement, after having been run over, plowed down,   
   >>>>>>>>>> assaulted with a deadly weapon, vehicularly (Y, IK) assaulted,   
   >>>>>>>>>> or any other term you might want to use   
   >>>>>>>>>> here, usually shoot until the perpetrator is incapacitated or   
   >>>>>>>>>> out of range, to keep the driver from doing any more harm to   
   >>>>>>>>>> others or even themselves.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Except this officer was not "run over" OR "plowed down".   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> But he was hit.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> A threat is not "over" just because the vehicle has cleared the   
   >>>>>>>>>> officer's path.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Yes, actually it is.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Who says? You?  LOL   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> If Good has already demonstrated her intent (which the officers   
   >>>>>>>>>> did not KNOW) to use a vehicle as a weapon, they remain a   
   >>>>>>>>>> 'deadly threat" until they are stopped. Turning "away" could   
   >>>>>>>>>> simply be a maneuver to reposition for another strike or to   
   >>>>>>>>>> flee at high speeds, endangering the public.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Her obvious intent was to leave the area and an officer with no   
   >>>>>>>>> authority grabbed at her door, escalating the situation.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> No authority? He's a law officer you moron.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>      So were the Capitol Police that   
   >>>>>>> Trump (and you) want to prosecute.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Like the one that murdered Ashley?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> She was breaking into a secure area and posed an immediate threat to   
   >>>>> those the police were defending behind that door.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> They had guns and she didn't.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>     Just like Renee Good.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> who weaponize her car.   
   >Who was just trying to leave the area.   
      
   By stomping on the gas with a man standing in front of her car?   
      
   --   
   Only losers want Socialism or Communism.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)