XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-16 15:12, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10ke2rs$1ui33$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-16 09:25, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 15:22:51 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-14 22:52, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Tmcvpwi.mp4   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 15:34:18 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> The "escaping vehicle" posed NO THREAT AT ALL.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> YOU do not know that for a fact, faggot. So... you knew that the roads   
   were   
   >>>>> clear all the way to where Good would have gone?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> That's the standard?   
   >>>   
   >>> Did I say that?   
   >>   
   >> Yes. That's exactly what you said.   
   >>   
   >> You suggest that it is OK to shoot someone because they might encounter   
   >> someone on the road at some point in the future.   
   >   
   > No he didn't. You spun it around to sound like that.   
      
   Ummmm...nope!   
      
   "you knew that the roads were clear all the way to where Good would have   
   gone?"   
      
   That is Loser explicitly claiming that shooting her was justified by the   
   mere possibility that she'd encounter someone else on the road and just   
   randomly decide to run them down.   
      
   >   
   > Why was she making a U Turn/3 point turn on a one way   
   > street?   
      
      
   Because she initially thought it wasn't a one way street.   
      
   > Why didn't you address the fact that you first claimed it   
   > was a U Turn and now call it a 3 point turn? Maybe you   
   > should give yourself a break. You seem confused.   
      
   Please. "U-turn" can generically mean to turn around on a road.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)