home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   can.politics      Libs bitching about what they voted for      997,123 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 996,175 of 997,123   
   Alan to Skeeter   
   Re: For The Idiot In The House   
   16 Jan 26 15:20:07   
   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-16 14:30, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10ke2tg$1ui33$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-15 16:30, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>> In article <10kbv65$15km4$24@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-15 15:54, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>> In article <10kbs1k$15km6$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026-01-13 04:33, NoBody wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 14:55:28 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-12 10:22, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 08:47:59 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Alan has run away.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> No. He hasn't and you know you're lying about it...   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> ...because by the time you made this post (the one to which I'm   
   >>>>>>>>>> replying), you'd already replied directly to me in another post   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> "Running away" implies more than not replying, moron.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> You haven't proven a fucking thing, whereas everyone else has.   
   >>>>>>>> You haven't proven a thing, Loser.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> And here, ladies and gentlemen, is the perfect liberal:  present him   
   >>>>>>> with video and photos that prove him wrong.  He declares, without   
   >>>>>>> proof, that the evidence is photoshopped then says we proved nothing.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Well we proved you're an idiot so there's that...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> There was one shot through the windshield...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> ...followed by two more through the open driver's window...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> ...when the shooter was in no danger at all.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Those two shots definitely contravene the use of force policy for his   
   >>>>>> department.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Oh shut up about that shit. He did what he had to do. You   
   >>>>> would have done the same, or maybe not, you're a puss.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I'd have just stepped out of the way, and no one would have died.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Liar, you would have stomped your feets and cried like a   
   >>> baby.   
   >>   
   >> Nope.   
   >   
   > Yup.   
   >>   
   >> I've been around moving vehicles and when I see one where the driver is   
   >> turning the wheel hard right and I'm standing just in front of the left   
   >> corner...   
   >   
   > You don't have a gun.   
      
   So having a gun makes using it a better option than stepping out of the way?   
      
      
   >> ...I simply move to my right by one step.   
   >   
   > Were they trying to hurt you? She knew exactly what she   
   > was doing. Only she failed.   
   If her intent was to hurt him...   
      
   ...why was she turning her steering wheel all the way to the right?   
      
   Straight ahead would have been far more effective, wouldn't it?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca