XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10ke30v$1ui33$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   uh@nope.com says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-16 04:30, NoBody wrote:   
   > >>>> 3. Authorized Officers/Agents should avoid intentionally and   
   > >>>> unreasonably placing themselves in positions in which they have no   
   > >>>> alternative to using deadly force.'   
   > >>> He did.  SHE changed that equation.   
   > >> He chose to remain there when a single step to his right would have   
   > >> taken him out of the danger area.   
   > > Laughter!   
   > >   
   > > I love how you pretend to be an armchair expert on what could or could   
   > > not have been done.  She weaponized her vehicle and he perceived a   
   > > threat to his life and safety.  Legit shoot.   
   >   
   > If she'd intended to drive into him, she wouldn't have been turning her   
   > steering wheel hard to the right...   
   >   
   > ...and therefore AWAY from him.   
   >   
   > She saw a man moving across from her right to left, and how was she to   
   > know he'd stop moving?   
      
   She knew exactly who he was. Stop playing stupid. Idiots   
   like you trying to say "she had no idea who he was" yet he   
   was wearing a uniform and her bitch wife was running   
   around taunting them So that lie is debunked.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)