XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump
From: nuh-uh@nope.com
On 2026-01-16 06:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 22:12:18 -0800, Alan wrote:
>
>> On 2026-01-15 21:56, Socialism is for losers wrote:
>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 03:14:15 +0000, Mitchell Holman
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Skeeter wrote in
>>>> news:MPG.43d32e5ab2984fa998ab8b@usnews.blocknews.net:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <10kbt0p$15km6$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2026-01-14 22:07, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article ,
>>>>>>> noemail@aol.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Skeeter wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:MPG.43d1df313a3f71e98ab02@usnews.blocknews.net:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <10k96l8$8549$14@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-12 09:39, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 11 Jan 2026 23:16:44 -0800, Alan says...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both criminals.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You aren't allowed to shoot at someone when they aren't a
>>>>>>>>>>>> threat.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Correct... I guess.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> But, no. (see bottom)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Even if his first shot was when he was near the front of the
>>>>>>>>>>>> vehicle, his next two were from directly beside the driver's
>>>>>>>>>>>> door, and it was turning AWAY from him.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And I've explained this, moron.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Law enforcement, after having been run over, plowed down,
>>>>>>>>>>> assaulted with a deadly weapon, vehicularly (Y, IK) assaulted,
>>>>>>>>>>> or any other term you might want to use
>>>>>>>>>>> here, usually shoot until the perpetrator is incapacitated or
>>>>>>>>>>> out of range, to keep the driver from doing any more harm to
>>>>>>>>>>> others or even themselves.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Except this officer was not "run over" OR "plowed down".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But he was hit.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> A threat is not "over" just because the vehicle has cleared the
>>>>>>>>>>> officer's path.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes, actually it is.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Who says? You? LOL
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If Good has already demonstrated her intent (which the officers
>>>>>>>>>>> did not KNOW) to use a vehicle as a weapon, they remain a
>>>>>>>>>>> 'deadly threat" until they are stopped. Turning "away" could
>>>>>>>>>>> simply be a maneuver to reposition for another strike or to
>>>>>>>>>>> flee at high speeds, endangering the public.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Her obvious intent was to leave the area and an officer with no
>>>>>>>>>> authority grabbed at her door, escalating the situation.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No authority? He's a law officer you moron.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So were the Capitol Police that
>>>>>>>> Trump (and you) want to prosecute.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Like the one that murdered Ashley?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> She was breaking into a secure area and posed an immediate threat to
>>>>>> those the police were defending behind that door.
>>>>>
>>>>> They had guns and she didn't.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Just like Renee Good.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> who weaponize her car.
>> Who was just trying to leave the area.
>
> By stomping on the gas with a man standing in front of her car?
By turning her wheel all the way to her right and assuming that a man
who had been walking to her left would continue to walk left.
And there was no "stomping".
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
