XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: MeanDog@Snarl.Dash   
      
   On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 16:34:58 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
      
   >On 2026-01-16 16:17, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:54:03 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 2026-01-16 06:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 22:12:18 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 2026-01-15 21:56, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 03:14:15 +0000, Mitchell Holman    
   >>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Skeeter  wrote in   
   >>>>>>> news:MPG.43d32e5ab2984fa998ab8b@usnews.blocknews.net:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> In article <10kbt0p$15km6$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-14 22:07, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> In article ,   
   >>>>>>>>>> noemail@aol.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter  wrote in   
   >>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.43d1df313a3f71e98ab02@usnews.blocknews.net:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10k96l8$8549$14@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-12 09:39, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 11 Jan 2026 23:16:44 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both criminals.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You aren't allowed to shoot at someone when they aren't a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct... I guess.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> But, no. (see bottom)   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even if his first shot was when he was near the front of the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vehicle, his next two were from directly beside the driver's   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> door, and it was turning AWAY from him.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I've explained this, moron.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Law enforcement, after having been run over, plowed down,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> assaulted with a deadly weapon, vehicularly (Y, IK) assaulted,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or any other term you might want to use   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> here, usually shoot until the perpetrator is incapacitated or   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> out of range, to keep the driver from doing any more harm to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> others or even themselves.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Except this officer was not "run over" OR "plowed down".   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> But he was hit.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> A threat is not "over" just because the vehicle has cleared the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> officer's path.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, actually it is.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Who says? You?  LOL   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If Good has already demonstrated her intent (which the officers   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> did not KNOW) to use a vehicle as a weapon, they remain a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'deadly threat" until they are stopped. Turning "away" could   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply be a maneuver to reposition for another strike or to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> flee at high speeds, endangering the public.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Her obvious intent was to leave the area and an officer with no   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> authority grabbed at her door, escalating the situation.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> No authority? He's a law officer you moron.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>        So were the Capitol Police that   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Trump (and you) want to prosecute.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Like the one that murdered Ashley?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> She was breaking into a secure area and posed an immediate threat to   
   >>>>>>>>> those the police were defending behind that door.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> They had guns and she didn't.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>       Just like Renee Good.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> who weaponize her car.   
   >>>>> Who was just trying to leave the area.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> By stomping on the gas with a man standing in front of her car?   
   >>> By turning her wheel all the way to her right and assuming that a man   
   >>> who had been walking to her left would continue to walk left.   
   >>>   
   >>> And there was no "stomping".   
   >>   
   >> The car sure jerked ahead as it hit him.   
   >Nope. The "officer" might have jerked, but there is video taken from   
   >outside the car and it moved off in a completely ordinary manner.   
      
   No, it jerked ahead.   
      
   >And you haven't addressed that she was clearly steering away from him...   
      
   ...and yet she hit him.   
      
   >...which she wouldn't have been doing if she was "weaponizing her car".   
      
   Nonsense. She had to have known that she'd hit him. She just didn't   
   expect that he'd be ready with a gun.   
      
   FAFO.   
      
   --   
   Only losers want Socialism or Communism.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)