XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-15 16:02, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10kbsuf$15km6$11@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-14 22:52, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>> On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 17:18:52 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >>>   
   >>>>> Sideways isn't "down an open road', liar.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> She was turning around.   
   >>>   
   >>> She hit the agent with her car.   
   >>   
   >> That is far from proven.   
   >   
   > Nope. You choose to ignore it.   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> THAT is all the agent needed to righteously discharge his weapon.   
   >>   
   >> False.   
   >   
   > What would you have done? Tell us a whopper.   
      
   Taken one step to my right...   
      
   ...as the policies of his agency make clear would be required.   
      
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> The 4th Amendment.   
   >> Even if she had struck him, he has no right to use deadly force when he   
   >> is no longer in danger, and he cannot simply imagine that at some point   
   >> in the future someone MIGHT be endangered by her.   
   >   
   > He did what anyone would have done. Get over it.   
   No...he did what a report on actions by such agents have been doing for   
   quite a while:   
      
   Created a situation where he could claim he was under threat so that he   
   could shoot someone.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)