XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10keh37$23gue$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   uh@nope.com says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-16 14:30, Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <10ke2tg$1ui33$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > > uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-01-15 16:30, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>> In article <10kbv65$15km4$24@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> On 2026-01-15 15:54, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>> In article <10kbs1k$15km6$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> On 2026-01-13 04:33, NoBody wrote:   
   > >>>>>>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 14:55:28 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-12 10:22, AlleyCat wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 08:47:59 -0800,  Alan says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> Alan has run away.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> No. He hasn't and you know you're lying about it...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> ...because by the time you made this post (the one to which I'm   
   > >>>>>>>>>> replying), you'd already replied directly to me in another post   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> "Running away" implies more than not replying, moron.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> You haven't proven a fucking thing, whereas everyone else has.   
   > >>>>>>>> You haven't proven a thing, Loser.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> And here, ladies and gentlemen, is the perfect liberal:  present him   
   > >>>>>>> with video and photos that prove him wrong.  He declares, without   
   > >>>>>>> proof, that the evidence is photoshopped then says we proved nothing.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> Well we proved you're an idiot so there's that...   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> There was one shot through the windshield...   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> ...followed by two more through the open driver's window...   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> ...when the shooter was in no danger at all.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> Those two shots definitely contravene the use of force policy for his   
   > >>>>>> department.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Oh shut up about that shit. He did what he had to do. You   
   > >>>>> would have done the same, or maybe not, you're a puss.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> I'd have just stepped out of the way, and no one would have died.   
   > >>>   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Liar, you would have stomped your feets and cried like a   
   > >>> baby.   
   > >>   
   > >> Nope.   
   > >   
   > > Yup.   
   > >>   
   > >> I've been around moving vehicles and when I see one where the driver is   
   > >> turning the wheel hard right and I'm standing just in front of the left   
   > >> corner...   
   > >   
   > > You don't have a gun.   
   >   
   > So having a gun makes using it a better option than stepping out of the way?   
      
   Try it and see.   
   >   
   >   
   > >> ...I simply move to my right by one step.   
   > >   
   > > Were they trying to hurt you? She knew exactly what she   
   > > was doing. Only she failed.   
   > If her intent was to hurt him...   
   >   
   > ...why was she turning her steering wheel all the way to the right?   
      
   You are stuck on that aren't ya? When it's all said and   
   done he will walk.   
   >   
   > Straight ahead would have been far more effective, wouldn't it?   
      
   It was enough to hit him. Why was she sideways on the   
   street?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)