XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10keh5c$23gue$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   uh@nope.com says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-16 14:25, Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <10ke30v$1ui33$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > > uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-01-16 04:30, NoBody wrote:   
   > >>>>>> 3. Authorized Officers/Agents should avoid intentionally and   
   > >>>>>> unreasonably placing themselves in positions in which they have no   
   > >>>>>> alternative to using deadly force.'   
   > >>>>> He did.  SHE changed that equation.   
   > >>>> He chose to remain there when a single step to his right would have   
   > >>>> taken him out of the danger area.   
   > >>> Laughter!   
   > >>>   
   > >>> I love how you pretend to be an armchair expert on what could or could   
   > >>> not have been done.  She weaponized her vehicle and he perceived a   
   > >>> threat to his life and safety.  Legit shoot.   
   > >>   
   > >> If she'd intended to drive into him, she wouldn't have been turning her   
   > >> steering wheel hard to the right...   
   > >>   
   > >> ...and therefore AWAY from him.   
   > >>   
   > >> She saw a man moving across from her right to left, and how was she to   
   > >> know he'd stop moving?   
   > >   
   > > She knew exactly who he was. Stop playing stupid. Idiots   
   > > like you trying to say "she had no idea who he was" yet he   
   > > was wearing a uniform and her bitch wife was running   
   > > around taunting them So that lie is debunked.   
   > The point you missed was that he was MOVING, and if he KEPT moving, he   
   > would have been out of the way.   
   >   
   > I was using "man" in the generic sense, not to suggest she didn't know   
   > he was with ICE.   
      
   Oh she knew.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)