XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10kenbg$24cdg$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   uh@nope.com says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-16 16:43, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   > > On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 16:35:41 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> On 2026-01-16 15:53, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   > >>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:43:39 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>> On 2026-01-16 09:25, AlleyCat wrote:   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 15:17:39 -0800,  Alan says...   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>> I was in the Queen's York Rangers.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Uhhh... NO ONE gives a shit.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Had a lot of people trying to run you over in cars, did you?   
   > >>>> Nope. But she wasn't trying to run him over.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> She wouldn't have turned the wheel all the way to the right if she was.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> You think you could read her mind?   
   > >>>   
   > >>> The only available facts are that she hit him and he killed her.   
   > >>   
   > >> I can read the fact that a man was walking to her left and she was   
   > >> steering to the right. Those are facts too.   
   > >   
   > > He was not walking when she hit him.   
   > That's my point: he stopped.   
   >   
   > When all the use of force policies explicitly state you shouldn't stop   
   > in front of a vehicle...   
   >   
   > ...he stopped.   
   >   
   > One more step to his right / her left and he is completely clear of any   
   > possible conflict.   
      
   The road was icy as hell. The car could have gone any   
   direction.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)