XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-16 18:03, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10keh09$23gue$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-16 15:12, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>> In article <10ke2rs$1ui33$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-16 09:25, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 15:22:51 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026-01-14 22:52, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Tmcvpwi.mp4   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 15:34:18 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> The "escaping vehicle" posed NO THREAT AT ALL.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> YOU do not know that for a fact, faggot. So... you knew that the roads   
   were   
   >>>>>>> clear all the way to where Good would have gone?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> That's the standard?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Did I say that?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Yes. That's exactly what you said.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You suggest that it is OK to shoot someone because they might encounter   
   >>>> someone on the road at some point in the future.   
   >>>   
   >>> No he didn't. You spun it around to sound like that.   
   >>   
   >> Ummmm...nope!   
   >>   
   >> "you knew that the roads were clear all the way to where Good would have   
   >> gone?"   
   >>   
   >> That is Loser explicitly claiming that shooting her was justified by the   
   >> mere possibility that she'd encounter someone else on the road and just   
   >> randomly decide to run them down.   
   >   
   > You sure can turn a mole hill into a mountain.   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> Why was she making a U Turn/3 point turn on a one way   
   >>> street?   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Because she initially thought it wasn't a one way street.   
   >   
   > As she was driving down a "one way street"?  The street   
   > had a lot of cars. Why would she decide to turn around and   
   > it just by coincidence that there were ICE agents right   
   > there doing their job when her wife started running and   
   > taunting ICE. But you losers claim she didn't know who he   
   > was. Are you that stupid?   
   >>   
   >>> Why didn't you address the fact that you first claimed it   
   >>> was a U Turn and now call it a 3 point turn? Maybe you   
   >>> should give yourself a break. You seem confused.   
   >>   
   >> Please. "U-turn" can generically mean to turn around on a road.   
   >   
   > On a one way street? Was it a U Turn or a 3 point turn?   
   >   
   >   
      
   Yes.   
      
   I know this will come as a surprise to you, but people can make mistakes.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)