XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump
From: nuh-uh@nope.com
On 2026-01-16 18:09, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <10kenbg$24cdg$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2026-01-16 16:43, Socialism is for losers wrote:
>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 16:35:41 -0800, Alan wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2026-01-16 15:53, Socialism is for losers wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:43:39 -0800, Alan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:25, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 15:17:39 -0800, Alan says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I was in the Queen's York Rangers.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Uhhh... NO ONE gives a shit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Had a lot of people trying to run you over in cars, did you?
>>>>>> Nope. But she wasn't trying to run him over.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> She wouldn't have turned the wheel all the way to the right if she was.
>>>>>
>>>>> You think you could read her mind?
>>>>>
>>>>> The only available facts are that she hit him and he killed her.
>>>>
>>>> I can read the fact that a man was walking to her left and she was
>>>> steering to the right. Those are facts too.
>>>
>>> He was not walking when she hit him.
>> That's my point: he stopped.
>>
>> When all the use of force policies explicitly state you shouldn't stop
>> in front of a vehicle...
>>
>> ...he stopped.
>>
>> One more step to his right / her left and he is completely clear of any
>> possible conflict.
>
> The road was icy as hell. The car could have gone any
> direction.
Ummmm....no.
As a matter of fact, vehicle dynamics are a huge thing for me (I teach
road racing).
A vehicle with it's wheels turned to the right won't move "any direction".
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
