XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-16 18:14, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10keiop$23gth$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>> ... and say this.   
   >>>   
   >>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:34:23 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >>>   
   >>>>> Road?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> https://i.imgur.com/OC9smu9.mp4   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Lfbiqwg.jpeg   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> See those people standing thar, stoopit? WHAT are they standing on?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Were any of those people in the direction she intended to travel?   
   >>>   
   >>> Sure they were.   
   >>>   
   >>> How do YOU know where Good was "intending to travel"?   
   >>>   
   >>> You don't.   
   >>>   
   >>> I was making an illustrative point. YOU moved the goalposts, as usual, with   
   >>> your fallacy of the specific.   
   >>>   
   >>> She could have gone down the street MADE A 3-POINT TURN and came back at   
   the   
   >>> officers, them, having to draw the weapons again and shoot her again.   
   >> So by pretending you know her intent was to run over an "officer"...   
   >   
   > Well you seem to be able to read minds you tell us.   
      
   So when he states her intent he's NOT reading minds?   
      
   >>   
   >> ...you then pretend they need to protect against future "attacks".   
   >>   
   >> She was turning away from the officer, doofus.   
   >   
   > On a one way street on a very icy road. No telling what   
   > could happen.   
   Actually there is "telling" that the car could not have gone to its left   
   with the wheels turned right.   
      
   And regardless, it shows her intent.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)