XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump
From: invalid@none.com
In article <10kej2r$23gth$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-
uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2026-01-16 06:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 22:12:18 -0800, Alan wrote:
> >
> >> On 2026-01-15 21:56, Socialism is for losers wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 03:14:15 +0000, Mitchell Holman
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Skeeter wrote in
> >>>> news:MPG.43d32e5ab2984fa998ab8b@usnews.blocknews.net:
> >>>>
> >>>>> In article <10kbt0p$15km6$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2026-01-14 22:07, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article ,
> >>>>>>> noemail@aol.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Skeeter wrote in
> >>>>>>>> news:MPG.43d1df313a3f71e98ab02@usnews.blocknews.net:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> In article <10k96l8$8549$14@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-12 09:39, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 11 Jan 2026 23:16:44 -0800, Alan says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Both criminals.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> You aren't allowed to shoot at someone when they aren't a
> >>>>>>>>>>>> threat.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Correct... I guess.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> But, no. (see bottom)
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Even if his first shot was when he was near the front of the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> vehicle, his next two were from directly beside the driver's
> >>>>>>>>>>>> door, and it was turning AWAY from him.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> And I've explained this, moron.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Law enforcement, after having been run over, plowed down,
> >>>>>>>>>>> assaulted with a deadly weapon, vehicularly (Y, IK) assaulted,
> >>>>>>>>>>> or any other term you might want to use
> >>>>>>>>>>> here, usually shoot until the perpetrator is incapacitated or
> >>>>>>>>>>> out of range, to keep the driver from doing any more harm to
> >>>>>>>>>>> others or even themselves.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Except this officer was not "run over" OR "plowed down".
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> But he was hit.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> A threat is not "over" just because the vehicle has cleared the
> >>>>>>>>>>> officer's path.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Yes, actually it is.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Who says? You? LOL
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> If Good has already demonstrated her intent (which the officers
> >>>>>>>>>>> did not KNOW) to use a vehicle as a weapon, they remain a
> >>>>>>>>>>> 'deadly threat" until they are stopped. Turning "away" could
> >>>>>>>>>>> simply be a maneuver to reposition for another strike or to
> >>>>>>>>>>> flee at high speeds, endangering the public.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Her obvious intent was to leave the area and an officer with no
> >>>>>>>>>> authority grabbed at her door, escalating the situation.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> No authority? He's a law officer you moron.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> So were the Capitol Police that
> >>>>>>>> Trump (and you) want to prosecute.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Like the one that murdered Ashley?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> She was breaking into a secure area and posed an immediate threat to
> >>>>>> those the police were defending behind that door.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> They had guns and she didn't.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Just like Renee Good.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> who weaponize her car.
> >> Who was just trying to leave the area.
> >
> > By stomping on the gas with a man standing in front of her car?
> By turning her wheel all the way to her right and assuming that a man
> who had been walking to her left would continue to walk left.
>
> And there was no "stomping".
Her tires were spinning on the ice.
LOL Did you see what I did there?
But really.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
