XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-16 18:51, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10kelfi$24cdg$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-16 16:17, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:54:03 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-16 06:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 22:12:18 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026-01-15 21:56, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 03:14:15 +0000, Mitchell Holman    
   >>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Skeeter  wrote in   
   >>>>>>>> news:MPG.43d32e5ab2984fa998ab8b@usnews.blocknews.net:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> In article <10kbt0p$15km6$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-14 22:07, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> In article ,   
   >>>>>>>>>>> noemail@aol.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter  wrote in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.43d1df313a3f71e98ab02@usnews.blocknews.net:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10k96l8$8549$14@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-12 09:39, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 11 Jan 2026 23:16:44 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both criminals.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You aren't allowed to shoot at someone when they aren't a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct... I guess.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But, no. (see bottom)   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even if his first shot was when he was near the front of the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vehicle, his next two were from directly beside the driver's   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> door, and it was turning AWAY from him.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I've explained this, moron.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Law enforcement, after having been run over, plowed down,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assaulted with a deadly weapon, vehicularly (Y, IK) assaulted,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or any other term you might want to use   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here, usually shoot until the perpetrator is incapacitated or   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out of range, to keep the driver from doing any more harm to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others or even themselves.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Except this officer was not "run over" OR "plowed down".   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> But he was hit.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A threat is not "over" just because the vehicle has cleared the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officer's path.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, actually it is.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Who says? You?  LOL   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If Good has already demonstrated her intent (which the officers   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did not KNOW) to use a vehicle as a weapon, they remain a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'deadly threat" until they are stopped. Turning "away" could   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply be a maneuver to reposition for another strike or to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flee at high speeds, endangering the public.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Her obvious intent was to leave the area and an officer with no   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> authority grabbed at her door, escalating the situation.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> No authority? He's a law officer you moron.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>         So were the Capitol Police that   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Trump (and you) want to prosecute.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Like the one that murdered Ashley?   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> She was breaking into a secure area and posed an immediate threat to   
   >>>>>>>>>> those the police were defending behind that door.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> They had guns and she didn't.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>        Just like Renee Good.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> who weaponize her car.   
   >>>>>> Who was just trying to leave the area.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> By stomping on the gas with a man standing in front of her car?   
   >>>> By turning her wheel all the way to her right and assuming that a man   
   >>>> who had been walking to her left would continue to walk left.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> And there was no "stomping".   
   >>>   
   >>> The car sure jerked ahead as it hit him.   
   >> Nope. The "officer" might have jerked, but there is video taken from   
   >> outside the car and it moved off in a completely ordinary manner.   
   >   
   > It jerked.   
      
   The officer seems to have jerked in his cellphone video...   
      
   ...but that doesn't prove that he was struck.   
      
   Moving himself quickly out of the way could produce such a jerk.   
      
   >>   
   >> And you haven't addressed that she was clearly steering away from him..   
   >   
   > Well she's a shitty driver then. Besides she was making a   
   > u turn on a one way street. You defended her by saying she   
   > didn't know it was a one way street. So not only is she a   
   > shitty driver she shouldn't even be driving at all.   
      
   None of that changes that she was steering away from him.   
      
   >>   
   >> ...which she wouldn't have been doing if she was "weaponizing her car".   
   >   
   >   
   > Oh you read her mind? How many time have you personally   
   > been in the same situation? Never? Then STFU.   
   If her intent was to hit him, she chose a course of action that   
   absolutely minimized the chance.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)