XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump
From: nuh-uh@nope.com
On 2026-01-16 18:46, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <10kej2r$23gth$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2026-01-16 06:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 22:12:18 -0800, Alan wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2026-01-15 21:56, Socialism is for losers wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 03:14:15 +0000, Mitchell Holman
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Skeeter wrote in
>>>>>> news:MPG.43d32e5ab2984fa998ab8b@usnews.blocknews.net:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <10kbt0p$15km6$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-14 22:07, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article ,
>>>>>>>>> noemail@aol.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter wrote in
>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.43d1df313a3f71e98ab02@usnews.blocknews.net:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10k96l8$8549$14@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-12 09:39, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 11 Jan 2026 23:16:44 -0800, Alan says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both criminals.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You aren't allowed to shoot at someone when they aren't a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct... I guess.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But, no. (see bottom)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even if his first shot was when he was near the front of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vehicle, his next two were from directly beside the driver's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> door, and it was turning AWAY from him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I've explained this, moron.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Law enforcement, after having been run over, plowed down,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> assaulted with a deadly weapon, vehicularly (Y, IK) assaulted,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> or any other term you might want to use
>>>>>>>>>>>>> here, usually shoot until the perpetrator is incapacitated or
>>>>>>>>>>>>> out of range, to keep the driver from doing any more harm to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> others or even themselves.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Except this officer was not "run over" OR "plowed down".
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> But he was hit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A threat is not "over" just because the vehicle has cleared the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> officer's path.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, actually it is.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Who says? You? LOL
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If Good has already demonstrated her intent (which the officers
>>>>>>>>>>>>> did not KNOW) to use a vehicle as a weapon, they remain a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'deadly threat" until they are stopped. Turning "away" could
>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply be a maneuver to reposition for another strike or to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> flee at high speeds, endangering the public.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Her obvious intent was to leave the area and an officer with no
>>>>>>>>>>>> authority grabbed at her door, escalating the situation.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No authority? He's a law officer you moron.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So were the Capitol Police that
>>>>>>>>>> Trump (and you) want to prosecute.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Like the one that murdered Ashley?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> She was breaking into a secure area and posed an immediate threat to
>>>>>>>> those the police were defending behind that door.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They had guns and she didn't.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just like Renee Good.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> who weaponize her car.
>>>> Who was just trying to leave the area.
>>>
>>> By stomping on the gas with a man standing in front of her car?
>> By turning her wheel all the way to her right and assuming that a man
>> who had been walking to her left would continue to walk left.
>>
>> And there was no "stomping".
>
> Her tires were spinning on the ice.
OK... ...but that means she would be moving even MORE slowly.
>
>
> LOL Did you see what I did there?
>
>
> But really.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
