XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump
From: invalid@none.com
In article <10kerdo$268b0$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2026-01-16 17:53, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <10keh37$23gue$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> > uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2026-01-16 14:30, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <10ke2tg$1ui33$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2026-01-15 16:30, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <10kbv65$15km4$24@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2026-01-15 15:54, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <10kbs1k$15km6$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-13 04:33, NoBody wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 14:55:28 -0800, Alan wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-12 10:22, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 08:47:59 -0800, Alan says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan has run away.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> No. He hasn't and you know you're lying about it...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> ...because by the time you made this post (the one to which I'm
> >>>>>>>>>>>> replying), you'd already replied directly to me in another post
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> "Running away" implies more than not replying, moron.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> You haven't proven a fucking thing, whereas everyone else has.
> >>>>>>>>>> You haven't proven a thing, Loser.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> And here, ladies and gentlemen, is the perfect liberal: present
him
> >>>>>>>>> with video and photos that prove him wrong. He declares, without
> >>>>>>>>> proof, that the evidence is photoshopped then says we proved
nothing.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Well we proved you're an idiot so there's that...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> There was one shot through the windshield...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ...followed by two more through the open driver's window...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ...when the shooter was in no danger at all.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Those two shots definitely contravene the use of force policy for
his
> >>>>>>>> department.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Oh shut up about that shit. He did what he had to do. You
> >>>>>>> would have done the same, or maybe not, you're a puss.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'd have just stepped out of the way, and no one would have died.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Liar, you would have stomped your feets and cried like a
> >>>>> baby.
> >>>>
> >>>> Nope.
> >>>
> >>> Yup.
> >>>>
> >>>> I've been around moving vehicles and when I see one where the driver is
> >>>> turning the wheel hard right and I'm standing just in front of the left
> >>>> corner...
> >>>
> >>> You don't have a gun.
> >>
> >> So having a gun makes using it a better option than stepping out of the
way?
> >
> > Try it and see.
>
> According to you, he was struck by the vehicle.
>
> Stepping out of the way he wouldn't have been struck, right?
And if she would have just kept driving on a one way
street none of this would have happened. FAFO
>
>
> >>
> >>
> >>>> ...I simply move to my right by one step.
> >>>
> >>> Were they trying to hurt you? She knew exactly what she
> >>> was doing. Only she failed.
> >> If her intent was to hurt him...
> >>
> >> ...why was she turning her steering wheel all the way to the right?
> >
> > You are stuck on that aren't ya? When it's all said and
> > done he will walk.
>
> And you can't answer.
I just did moron. BTW I notice you ran away from a few
more threads. Maybe if you just kept your useless opinions
to yourself you wouldn't have to run so much.
>
> >>
> >> Straight ahead would have been far more effective, wouldn't it?
> >
> > It was enough to hit him. Why was she sideways on the
> > street?
> She was in the middle turning in the correct direction >
> to leave.
On a one way street?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
