XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10kerfe$268b0$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   uh@nope.com says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-16 18:03, Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <10keh09$23gue$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > > uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-01-16 15:12, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>> In article <10ke2rs$1ui33$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> On 2026-01-16 09:25, AlleyCat wrote:   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 15:22:51 -0800,  Alan says...   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> On 2026-01-14 22:52, AlleyCat wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Tmcvpwi.mp4   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 15:34:18 -0800,  Alan says...   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> The "escaping vehicle" posed NO THREAT AT ALL.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> YOU do not know that for a fact, faggot. So... you knew that the   
   roads were   
   > >>>>>>> clear all the way to where Good would have gone?   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> That's the standard?   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Did I say that?   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Yes. That's exactly what you said.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> You suggest that it is OK to shoot someone because they might encounter   
   > >>>> someone on the road at some point in the future.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> No he didn't. You spun it around to sound like that.   
   > >>   
   > >> Ummmm...nope!   
   > >>   
   > >> "you knew that the roads were clear all the way to where Good would have   
   > >> gone?"   
   > >>   
   > >> That is Loser explicitly claiming that shooting her was justified by the   
   > >> mere possibility that she'd encounter someone else on the road and just   
   > >> randomly decide to run them down.   
   > >   
   > > You sure can turn a mole hill into a mountain.   
   > >>   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Why was she making a U Turn/3 point turn on a one way   
   > >>> street?   
   > >>   
   > >>   
   > >> Because she initially thought it wasn't a one way street.   
   > >   
   > > As she was driving down a "one way street"?  The street   
   > > had a lot of cars. Why would she decide to turn around and   
   > > it just by coincidence that there were ICE agents right   
   > > there doing their job when her wife started running and   
   > > taunting ICE. But you losers claim she didn't know who he   
   > > was. Are you that stupid?   
   > >>   
   > >>> Why didn't you address the fact that you first claimed it   
   > >>> was a U Turn and now call it a 3 point turn? Maybe you   
   > >>> should give yourself a break. You seem confused.   
   > >>   
   > >> Please. "U-turn" can generically mean to turn around on a road.   
   > >   
   > > On a one way street? Was it a U Turn or a 3 point turn?   
   > >   
   > >   
   >   
   > Yes.   
   >   
   > I know this will come as a surprise to you, but people can make mistakes.   
      
   It had lots of cars all going the same direction. She knew   
   where she was. If she didn't she shouldn't be driving and   
   that makes her a danger to herself and others.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)