XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-16 20:10, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10kerfe$268b0$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-16 18:03, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>> In article <10keh09$23gue$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-16 15:12, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>> In article <10ke2rs$1ui33$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:25, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 15:22:51 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-14 22:52, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Tmcvpwi.mp4   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 15:34:18 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> The "escaping vehicle" posed NO THREAT AT ALL.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> YOU do not know that for a fact, faggot. So... you knew that the   
   roads were   
   >>>>>>>>> clear all the way to where Good would have gone?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> That's the standard?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Did I say that?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Yes. That's exactly what you said.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> You suggest that it is OK to shoot someone because they might encounter   
   >>>>>> someone on the road at some point in the future.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> No he didn't. You spun it around to sound like that.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Ummmm...nope!   
   >>>>   
   >>>> "you knew that the roads were clear all the way to where Good would have   
   >>>> gone?"   
   >>>>   
   >>>> That is Loser explicitly claiming that shooting her was justified by the   
   >>>> mere possibility that she'd encounter someone else on the road and just   
   >>>> randomly decide to run them down.   
   >>>   
   >>> You sure can turn a mole hill into a mountain.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Why was she making a U Turn/3 point turn on a one way   
   >>>>> street?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Because she initially thought it wasn't a one way street.   
   >>>   
   >>> As she was driving down a "one way street"?  The street   
   >>> had a lot of cars. Why would she decide to turn around and   
   >>> it just by coincidence that there were ICE agents right   
   >>> there doing their job when her wife started running and   
   >>> taunting ICE. But you losers claim she didn't know who he   
   >>> was. Are you that stupid?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Why didn't you address the fact that you first claimed it   
   >>>>> was a U Turn and now call it a 3 point turn? Maybe you   
   >>>>> should give yourself a break. You seem confused.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Please. "U-turn" can generically mean to turn around on a road.   
   >>>   
   >>> On a one way street? Was it a U Turn or a 3 point turn?   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Yes.   
   >>   
   >> I know this will come as a surprise to you, but people can make mistakes.   
   >   
   > It had lots of cars all going the same direction.   
      
   True. So?   
      
   > She knew   
   > where she was.   
      
   How do you know that?   
      
   > If she didn't she shouldn't be driving and   
   > that makes her a danger to herself and others.   
      
   You think that otherwise completely competent drivers never find   
   themselves on streets that they're not familiar with?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)