XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-16 19:42, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10kes61$26qks$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-16 18:12, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>> In article <10keimd$23gth$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 16:07:58 -0700,  Skeeter says...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>> She was a citizen attempting to turn around and depart the area.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> You read minds now?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> He's always thought he could read minds.   
   >>>> I don't need to read minds.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The "officer's" own cellphone video shows her turning hard to her right.   
   >>>   
   >>> and him getting hit.   
   >>   
   >> Nope. That doesn't actuall appear in his video...   
   >>   
   >> ...but than you for admitting it does show she was turning hard right.   
   >   
   > Yet still went forward.   
      
   If you mean straight forward, it most certainly did not.   
      
   > I never admitted anything cupcake.   
      
   That is the implication of your use of "and" in the sentence fragment   
   you were attaching to my earlier sentence.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)