XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-16 20:17, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10keu90$27aph$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-16 18:54, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>> In article <10ken1m$24cdg$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-16 16:57, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 16:53:06 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 16:38, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> The car sure jerked ahead as it hit him.   
   >>>>>>>> Nope. The "officer" might have jerked, but there is video taken from   
   >>>>>>>> outside the car and it moved off in a completely ordinary manner.   
   >>>>>>> No, it jerked ahead.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> There is a video that shows it did not.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> And you haven't addressed that she was clearly steering away from   
   him...   
   >>>>>>> ...and yet she hit him.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> ...which she wouldn't have been doing if she was "weaponizing her   
   car".   
   >>>>>>> Nonsense. She had to have known that she'd hit him. She just didn't   
   >>>>>>> expect that he'd be ready with a gun.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> On the contrary.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> He was clearly moving as she began to back and turn her wheel left.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Then he CHOOSES to stop in front of the left corner of her car and draw   
   >>>>>> his weapon when one more step to his right would have put him out of any   
   >>>>>> danger being struck.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Her intent to simply leave can be inferred from the fact that she was   
   >>>>>> turning away from him. His own cellphone video shows it.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I understand your need to misrepresent what happened.   
   >>>> There is no misrepresentation.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Her clear intention is to complete a turn and leave the area.   
   >>>   
   >>> On a one way street?   
   >>   
   >> Yup. She came upon an ICE operation while driving home and at first   
   >> tried to turn around to leave the way she'd come, then she realized that   
   >> the street was one way, so half way through a three point turn, she   
   >> changed her mind and proceed to get her car pointed back in the correct   
   >> direction.   
   >   
   > So you can read minds. How do you explain her wife running   
   > around and filing and taunting ICE? I thought Renee was   
   > just "turning around".   
      
   In a chaotic situation, her wife decided to get out to document what was   
   happening, and maybe to help guide Good in backing up in a tight space.   
      
   >>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> She waved ICE vehicles by   
   >>>   
   >>> But you said she didn't know who they were.   
   >> Nope. I used the term "man" in a generic sense with no comment on her   
   >> knowledge at all.   
   >   
   > She knew who they were. Her wife made that obvious.   
   And that's irrelevant in the context of my use of the word "man".   
      
   It never had anything to do with trying to claim Good didn't know the   
   man was with ICE.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)