Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.politics    |    Libs bitching about what they voted for    |    997,123 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 996,265 of 997,123    |
|    Skeeter to All    |
|    Re: Liberal Faggot... Wrong Again    |
|    16 Jan 26 21:33:40    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump       From: invalid@none.com              In article <10kf2vb$28kku$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-       uh@nope.com says...       >       > On 2026-01-16 19:27, Skeeter wrote:       > > In article <10keo4s$24cdg$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > > uh@nope.com says...       > >>       > >> On 2026-01-15 16:02, Skeeter wrote:       > >>> In article <10kbsuf$15km6$11@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>       > >>>> On 2026-01-14 22:52, AlleyCat wrote:       > >>>>>       > >>>>> On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 17:18:52 -0800, Alan says...       > >>>>>       > >>>>>>> Sideways isn't "down an open road', liar.       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> She was turning around.       > >>>>>       > >>>>> She hit the agent with her car.       > >>>>       > >>>> That is far from proven.       > >>>       > >>> Nope. You choose to ignore it.       > >>>>       > >>>>>       > >>>>> THAT is all the agent needed to righteously discharge his weapon.       > >>>>       > >>>> False.       > >>>       > >>> What would you have done? Tell us a whopper.       > >>       > >> Taken one step to my right...       > >>       > >> ...as the policies of his agency make clear would be required.       > >       > > Do you always live like you're programmed? Or do you just       > > suck at trolling?       >       > If I were in an agency that said you can't treat a vehicle as a threat       > unless you cannot get out of the way...       >       > ...I'd do as I was taught.Well that will never happen              That will never happen and you have no idea what you would       do in that situation.       >       > >>       > >>>>       > >>>>>       > >>>>> The 4th Amendment.       > >>>> Even if she had struck him, he has no right to use deadly force when he       > >>>> is no longer in danger, and he cannot simply imagine that at some point       > >>>> in the future someone MIGHT be endangered by her.       > >>>       > >>> He did what anyone would have done. Get over it.       > >> No...he did what a report on actions by such agents have been doing for       > >> quite a while:       > >>       > >> Created a situation where he could claim he was under threat so that he       > >> could shoot someone.       > >       > > So you really can read minds. I'll be damned.       > You should read the 2013 report on CBP conduct with vehicles and shootings.              But your logic and other bull will never help her in       court.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca