home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   can.politics      Libs bitching about what they voted for      997,123 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 996,265 of 997,123   
   Skeeter to All   
   Re: Liberal Faggot... Wrong Again   
   16 Jan 26 21:33:40   
   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10kf2vb$28kku$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   uh@nope.com says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-16 19:27, Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <10keo4s$24cdg$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > > uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-01-15 16:02, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>> In article <10kbsuf$15km6$11@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> On 2026-01-14 22:52, AlleyCat wrote:   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 17:18:52 -0800,  Alan says...   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> Sideways isn't "down an open road', liar.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> She was turning around.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> She hit the agent with her car.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> That is far from proven.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Nope. You choose to ignore it.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> THAT is all the agent needed to righteously discharge his weapon.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> False.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> What would you have done? Tell us a whopper.   
   > >>   
   > >> Taken one step to my right...   
   > >>   
   > >> ...as the policies of his agency make clear would be required.   
   > >   
   > > Do you always live like you're programmed? Or do you just   
   > > suck at trolling?   
   >   
   > If I were in an agency that said you can't treat a vehicle as a threat   
   > unless you cannot get out of the way...   
   >   
   > ...I'd do as I was taught.Well that will never happen   
      
   That will never happen and you have no idea what you would   
   do in that situation.   
   >   
   > >>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> The 4th Amendment.   
   > >>>> Even if she had struck him, he has no right to use deadly force when he   
   > >>>> is no longer in danger, and he cannot simply imagine that at some point   
   > >>>> in the future someone MIGHT be endangered by her.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> He did what anyone would have done. Get over it.   
   > >> No...he did what a report on actions by such agents have been doing for   
   > >> quite a while:   
   > >>   
   > >> Created a situation where he could claim he was under threat so that he   
   > >> could shoot someone.   
   > >   
   > > So you really can read minds. I'll be damned.   
   > You should read the 2013 report on CBP conduct with vehicles and shootings.   
      
   But your logic and other bull will never help her in   
   court.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca