XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10kf2s7$28kku$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   uh@nope.com says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-16 19:33, Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <10kerdo$268b0$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > > uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-01-16 17:53, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>> In article <10keh37$23gue$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> On 2026-01-16 14:30, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>> In article <10ke2tg$1ui33$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> On 2026-01-15 16:30, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>> In article <10kbv65$15km4$24@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-15 15:54, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>> In article <10kbs1k$15km6$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-13 04:33, NoBody wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 14:55:28 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-12 10:22, AlleyCat wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 08:47:59 -0800,  Alan says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan has run away.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. He hasn't and you know you're lying about it...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...because by the time you made this post (the one to which   
   I'm   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> replying), you'd already replied directly to me in another   
   post   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Running away" implies more than not replying, moron.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> You haven't proven a fucking thing, whereas everyone else has.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> You haven't proven a thing, Loser.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> And here, ladies and gentlemen, is the perfect liberal:  present   
   him   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> with video and photos that prove him wrong.  He declares, without   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> proof, that the evidence is photoshopped then says we proved   
   nothing.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> Well we proved you're an idiot so there's that...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> There was one shot through the windshield...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> ...followed by two more through the open driver's window...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> ...when the shooter was in no danger at all.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> Those two shots definitely contravene the use of force policy for   
   his   
   > >>>>>>>>>> department.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> Oh shut up about that shit. He did what he had to do. You   
   > >>>>>>>>> would have done the same, or maybe not, you're a puss.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> I'd have just stepped out of the way, and no one would have died.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> Liar, you would have stomped your feets and cried like a   
   > >>>>>>> baby.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> Nope.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Yup.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> I've been around moving vehicles and when I see one where the driver   
   is   
   > >>>>>> turning the wheel hard right and I'm standing just in front of the   
   left   
   > >>>>>> corner...   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> You don't have a gun.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> So having a gun makes using it a better option than stepping out of the   
   way?   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Try it and see.   
   > >>   
   > >> According to you, he was struck by the vehicle.   
   > >>   
   > >> Stepping out of the way he wouldn't have  been struck, right?   
   > >   
   > > And if she would have just kept driving on a one way   
   > > street none of this would have happened. FAFO   
   >   
   > Do you know she COULD have "kept driving" when she first arrived?   
      
   Yes, instead of trying to turn around on a one way street   
   the easy thing to do would keep driving.   
   >   
   > >>   
   > >>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>>> ...I simply move to my right by one step.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Were they trying to hurt you? She knew exactly what she   
   > >>>>> was doing. Only she failed.   
   > >>>> If her intent was to hurt him...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> ...why was she turning her steering wheel all the way to the right?   
   > >>>   
   > >>> You are stuck on that aren't ya? When it's all said and   
   > >>> done he will walk.   
   > >>   
   > >> And you can't answer.   
   > >   
   > > I just did moron. BTW I notice you ran away from a few   
   > > more threads. Maybe if you just kept your useless opinions   
   > > to yourself you wouldn't have to run so much.   
   >   
   > LOL!   
      
   And he sidetracks again.   
   >   
   > >>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Straight ahead would have been far more effective, wouldn't it?   
   > >>>   
   > >>> It was enough to hit him. Why was she sideways on the   
   > >>> street?   
   > >> She was in the middle turning in the correct direction >   
   > >> to leave.   
   > >   
   > > On a one way street?   
   > Yes.   
      
   She was going the correct direction. So were the other   
   cars. So what the hell was she doing?   
   >   
   > Arrived, found the street partially blocked by ICE vehicles, started to   
   > turn around only to realize that that the street was only one way, so   
   > reversed what she had begun doing to continue on in the   
   correct direction.   
      
   Nope, even you said she was turning around. She knew the   
   ICE vehicles were there. Her wife proved that.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)