XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10kf2gb$28hf2$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   uh@nope.com says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <10kes86$26qks$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > > uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-01-16 18:14, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>> In article <10keiop$23gth$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> ... and say this.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:34:23 -0800,  Alan says...   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> Road?   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/OC9smu9.mp4   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Lfbiqwg.jpeg   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> See those people standing thar, stoopit? WHAT are they standing on?   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> Were any of those people in the direction she intended to travel?   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Sure they were.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> How do YOU know where Good was "intending to travel"?   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> You don't.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> I was making an illustrative point. YOU moved the goalposts, as usual,   
   with   
   > >>>>> your fallacy of the specific.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> She could have gone down the street MADE A 3-POINT TURN and came back   
   at the   
   > >>>>> officers, them, having to draw the weapons again and shoot her again.   
   > >>>> So by pretending you know her intent was to run over an "officer"...   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Well you seem to be able to read minds you tell us.   
   > >>   
   > >> So when he states her intent he's NOT reading minds?   
   > >   
   > > BUTWHATABOUT!   
   > >>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> ...you then pretend they need to protect against future "attacks".   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> She was turning away from the officer, doofus.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> On a one way street on a very icy road. No telling what   
   > >>> could happen.   
   > >> Actually there is "telling" that the car could not have gone to its left   
   > >> with the wheels turned right.   
   > >   
   > > But it went straight.   
   >   
   > No, it most certainly did not. COULD not have with the wheels turned all   
   > the way to the right.   
      
   But it did. Ice is crazy stuff.   
   >   
   > >>   
   > >> And regardless, it shows her intent.   
   > >   
   > > Which was to make a U Turn on a one way street and ICE   
   > > just happened to be there. Yea that will sell a jury.   
   > I suspect the reason she wanted to turn around was that ICE was present   
   > and she wanted to get out of there.   
      
   She was there because she knew who they were. That is   
   settled. Why didn't she just keep going? You will suck as   
   a lawyer.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)