XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10kf382$28hf2$9@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   uh@nope.com says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-16 20:17, Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <10keu90$27aph$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > > uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-01-16 18:54, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>> In article <10ken1m$24cdg$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> On 2026-01-16 16:57, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   > >>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 16:53:06 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 16:38, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>> The car sure jerked ahead as it hit him.   
   > >>>>>>>> Nope. The "officer" might have jerked, but there is video taken from   
   > >>>>>>>> outside the car and it moved off in a completely ordinary manner.   
   > >>>>>>> No, it jerked ahead.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> There is a video that shows it did not.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> And you haven't addressed that she was clearly steering away from   
   him...   
   > >>>>>>> ...and yet she hit him.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> ...which she wouldn't have been doing if she was "weaponizing her   
   car".   
   > >>>>>>> Nonsense. She had to have known that she'd hit him. She just didn't   
   > >>>>>>> expect that he'd be ready with a gun.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> On the contrary.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> He was clearly moving as she began to back and turn her wheel left.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> Then he CHOOSES to stop in front of the left corner of her car and   
   draw   
   > >>>>>> his weapon when one more step to his right would have put him out of   
   any   
   > >>>>>> danger being struck.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> Her intent to simply leave can be inferred from the fact that she was   
   > >>>>>> turning away from him. His own cellphone video shows it.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> I understand your need to misrepresent what happened.   
   > >>>> There is no misrepresentation.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Her clear intention is to complete a turn and leave the area.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> On a one way street?   
   > >>   
   > >> Yup. She came upon an ICE operation while driving home and at first   
   > >> tried to turn around to leave the way she'd come, then she realized that   
   > >> the street was one way, so half way through a three point turn, she   
   > >> changed her mind and proceed to get her car pointed back in the correct   
   > >> direction.   
   > >   
   > > So you can read minds. How do you explain her wife running   
   > > around and filing and taunting ICE? I thought Renee was   
   > > just "turning around".   
   >   
   > In a chaotic situation, her wife decided to get out to document what was   
   > happening, and maybe to help guide Good in backing up in a tight space.   
      
   Yea that what she was doing by running around the car   
   yelling and screaming. That was a lot of help I bet.   
   "Drive baby drive"  That will be brought up in court you   
   can bet.   
   >   
   > >>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> She waved ICE vehicles by   
   > >>>   
   > >>> But you said she didn't know who they were.   
   > >> Nope. I used the term "man" in a generic sense with no comment on her   
   > >> knowledge at all.   
   > >   
   > > She knew who they were. Her wife made that obvious.   
   > And that's irrelevant in the context of my use of the word "man".   
      
   No you just choose to ignore it.   
   >   
   > It never had anything to do with trying to claim Good didn't know the   
   > man was with ICE.   
      
   Now you flip again. Earlier you said she had no idea who   
   he was. Your foot must be getting sore.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)