XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: NoBody@nowhere.com   
      
   On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 11:19:59 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
      
   >On 2026-01-16 04:30, NoBody wrote:   
   >>>>> 3. Authorized Officers/Agents should avoid intentionally and   
   >>>>> unreasonably placing themselves in positions in which they have no   
   >>>>> alternative to using deadly force.'   
   >>>> He did.  SHE changed that equation.   
   >>> He chose to remain there when a single step to his right would have   
   >>> taken him out of the danger area.   
   >> Laughter!   
   >>   
   >> I love how you pretend to be an armchair expert on what could or could   
   >> not have been done.  She weaponized her vehicle and he perceived a   
   >> threat to his life and safety.  Legit shoot.   
   >   
   >If she'd intended to drive into him, she wouldn't have been turning her   
   >steering wheel hard to the right...   
   >   
      
   Love how you armchair ICE agent.   
      
   She reversed such that the vehicle was pointing towards him.   
   She gunned the gas so much that her tires spun.   
   She actually DID hit him.   
      
   >...and therefore AWAY from him.   
      
   Irrelevent since she weaponized her vehicle.   
   Justified use of force.   
      
   >   
   >She saw a man moving across from her right to left, and how was she to   
   >know he'd stop moving?   
      
   Guess she should have made sure he was clear before she tried to run.   
      
   This is basic logic here and you blame HIM for HER decisions.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)