XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: NoBody@nowhere.com   
      
   On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:21:16 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
      
   >On 2026-01-16 14:25, Skeeter wrote:   
   >> In article <10ke30v$1ui33$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>   
   >>> On 2026-01-16 04:30, NoBody wrote:   
   >>>>>>> 3. Authorized Officers/Agents should avoid intentionally and   
   >>>>>>> unreasonably placing themselves in positions in which they have no   
   >>>>>>> alternative to using deadly force.'   
   >>>>>> He did.  SHE changed that equation.   
   >>>>> He chose to remain there when a single step to his right would have   
   >>>>> taken him out of the danger area.   
   >>>> Laughter!   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I love how you pretend to be an armchair expert on what could or could   
   >>>> not have been done.  She weaponized her vehicle and he perceived a   
   >>>> threat to his life and safety.  Legit shoot.   
   >>>   
   >>> If she'd intended to drive into him, she wouldn't have been turning her   
   >>> steering wheel hard to the right...   
   >>>   
   >>> ...and therefore AWAY from him.   
   >>>   
   >>> She saw a man moving across from her right to left, and how was she to   
   >>> know he'd stop moving?   
   >>   
   >> She knew exactly who he was. Stop playing stupid. Idiots   
   >> like you trying to say "she had no idea who he was" yet he   
   >> was wearing a uniform and her bitch wife was running   
   >> around taunting them So that lie is debunked.   
   >The point you missed was that he was MOVING, and if he KEPT moving, he   
   >would have been out of the way.   
   >   
   >I was using "man" in the generic sense, not to suggest she didn't know   
   >he was with ICE.   
      
   She had been following them all day....   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)