Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.politics    |    Libs bitching about what they voted for    |    997,123 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 996,302 of 997,123    |
|    Alan to Socialism is for losers    |
|    Re: Poor Little Rich Kid... So Desperate    |
|    17 Jan 26 14:03:41    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump       From: nuh-uh@nope.com              On 2026-01-17 00:30, Socialism is for losers wrote:              >>>>>>>>> who weaponize her car.       >>>>>>>> Who was just trying to leave the area.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> By stomping on the gas with a man standing in front of her car?       >>>>>> By turning her wheel all the way to her right and assuming that a man       >>>>>> who had been walking to her left would continue to walk left.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> And there was no "stomping".       >>>>>       >>>>> The car sure jerked ahead as it hit him.       >>>> Nope. The "officer" might have jerked, but there is video taken from       >>>> outside the car and it moved off in a completely ordinary manner.       >>>       >>> It jerked.       >>       >> The officer seems to have jerked in his cellphone video...       >>       >> ...but that doesn't prove that he was struck.       >       > The other videos show he was hit.              No video shows it. Not one.              >       >       >> Moving himself quickly out of the way could produce such a jerk.       >>       >>>>       >>>> And you haven't addressed that she was clearly steering away from him..       >>>       >>> Well she's a shitty driver then. Besides she was making a       >>> u turn on a one way street. You defended her by saying she       >>> didn't know it was a one way street. So not only is she a       >>> shitty driver she shouldn't even be driving at all.       >>       >> None of that changes that she was steering away from him.       >       > She still hit him              That is, as yet, unproven.              >       >>>> ...which she wouldn't have been doing if she was "weaponizing her car".       >>>       >>>       >>> Oh you read her mind? How many time have you personally       >>> been in the same situation? Never? Then STFU.       >> If her intent was to hit him, she chose a course of action that       >> absolutely minimized the chance.       Got no answer for that part, huh?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca