XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump
From: nuh-uh@nope.com
On 2026-01-17 06:40, NoBody wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:21:16 -0800, Alan wrote:
>
>> On 2026-01-16 14:25, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <10ke30v$1ui33$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2026-01-16 04:30, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>> 3. Authorized Officers/Agents should avoid intentionally and
>>>>>>>> unreasonably placing themselves in positions in which they have no
>>>>>>>> alternative to using deadly force.'
>>>>>>> He did. SHE changed that equation.
>>>>>> He chose to remain there when a single step to his right would have
>>>>>> taken him out of the danger area.
>>>>> Laughter!
>>>>>
>>>>> I love how you pretend to be an armchair expert on what could or could
>>>>> not have been done. She weaponized her vehicle and he perceived a
>>>>> threat to his life and safety. Legit shoot.
>>>>
>>>> If she'd intended to drive into him, she wouldn't have been turning her
>>>> steering wheel hard to the right...
>>>>
>>>> ...and therefore AWAY from him.
>>>>
>>>> She saw a man moving across from her right to left, and how was she to
>>>> know he'd stop moving?
>>>
>>> She knew exactly who he was. Stop playing stupid. Idiots
>>> like you trying to say "she had no idea who he was" yet he
>>> was wearing a uniform and her bitch wife was running
>>> around taunting them So that lie is debunked.
>> The point you missed was that he was MOVING, and if he KEPT moving, he
>> would have been out of the way.
>>
>> I was using "man" in the generic sense, not to suggest she didn't know
>> he was with ICE.
>
> She had been following them all day....
Really?
And where did you learn that?
Was it from the same people who at first told you that the agent had
been "run over"?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
