home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   can.politics      Libs bitching about what they voted for      997,123 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 996,306 of 997,123   
   Alan to Skeeter   
   Re: Desperation Is, As Desperation Does   
   17 Jan 26 14:30:48   
   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-16 20:31, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10kf2eh$28hf2$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>> In article <10kerg2$268b0$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-16 18:03, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>> In article <10keh5c$23gue$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 14:25, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>> In article <10ke30v$1ui33$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 04:30, NoBody wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Authorized Officers/Agents should avoid intentionally and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> unreasonably placing themselves in positions in which they have no   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> alternative to using deadly force.'   
   >>>>>>>>>>> He did.  SHE changed that equation.   
   >>>>>>>>>> He chose to remain there when a single step to his right would have   
   >>>>>>>>>> taken him out of the danger area.   
   >>>>>>>>> Laughter!   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> I love how you pretend to be an armchair expert on what could or   
   could   
   >>>>>>>>> not have been done.  She weaponized her vehicle and he perceived a   
   >>>>>>>>> threat to his life and safety.  Legit shoot.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> If she'd intended to drive into him, she wouldn't have been turning   
   her   
   >>>>>>>> steering wheel hard to the right...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> ...and therefore AWAY from him.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> She saw a man moving across from her right to left, and how was she to   
   >>>>>>>> know he'd stop moving?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> She knew exactly who he was. Stop playing stupid. Idiots   
   >>>>>>> like you trying to say "she had no idea who he was" yet he   
   >>>>>>> was wearing a uniform and her bitch wife was running   
   >>>>>>> around taunting them So that lie is debunked.   
   >>>>>> The point you missed was that he was MOVING, and if he KEPT moving, he   
   >>>>>> would have been out of the way.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I was using "man" in the generic sense, not to suggest she didn't know   
   >>>>>> he was with ICE.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Oh she knew.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I know that.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I was never trying to deny it.   
   >>>   
   >>> You tried and failed. He was wearing an ICE uniform fer   
   >>> crissakes.   
   >>   
   >> My POINT at the time was that the driver saw SOMEONE moving to her left   
   >> when she was intending to go right. It doesn't matter WHO that someone was.   
   >   
   > It dod to her.   
      
   Nope. Not regarding the question of her intent.   
      
   >>   
   >> The normal and logical conclusion of someone moving to your left while   
   >> you're trying to go right is that they intend to get out of your way.   
   >   
   > Won't work in court. Try harder.   
   Intent can be inferred from action.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca