Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.politics    |    Libs bitching about what they voted for    |    997,123 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 996,316 of 997,123    |
|    Alan to Skeeter    |
|    Re: A Department Of Homeland Security (D    |
|    17 Jan 26 14:46:52    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump       From: nuh-uh@nope.com              On 2026-01-15 16:36, Skeeter wrote:              >>>>> It wasn't empty and if you call that a u turn then that       >>>>> explains why Canadians are such bad drivers.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> There was no "crowd" for her to have been aiming at.       >>>>>       >>>>> Just that one agent.       >>>>       >>>> Not in the direction she was intending to drive off he wasn't.       >>>       >>> Why was she turning around in the mddle of the road?       >>       >> Because she originally intended to go back the way she'd come...       >       > She couldn't just go around the block? Oh you're reading       > minds again?              No. There was clearly an ICE operation going on in front of her and she       wanted to IMMEDIATELY go back the other way to avoid it.              That meant turning around.              Then she realize it was a one way street so she COULDN'T go back that way.              >>       >> ...but realized that she couldn't.       >       > Not on a crowded road. Dumb bitch.       >>       >>>>       >>>> The PP was alluding to "Other people in her path, you fucking moron."       >>>> ASIDE from that "agent".       >>>       >>> No one else was in her path.       >>       >> Exactly!       >       > So shut up about it then.              I'm not the one who made up the bullshit that she need to be shot       because she might encounter someone in the street at some undetermined       time in the future, sunshine.              >>       >>>>       >>>> There were no such others for whom the "agent" could have been acting in       >>>> defense.       >>>       >>> Just for himself.       >>       >> Which ended once he was beside the vehicle not in front of it.       >       > So? He was still doing the right thing. Get over it.              No. He absolutely was not. By the policies of his agency he was not.              >>       >>>>       >>>>       >>>>>>> 6. Recent Surge in Attacks on Law Enforcement (2025)       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> A Department of Homeland Security (DHS) report released in late 2025       >>>>>>> highlighted a 1,300% increase in vehicle attacks specifically       targeting ICE       >>>>>>> officers.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> Homestead, FL (Sept 2024): A driver reversed his car into an ICE       officer       >>>>>>> during a traffic stop, nearly crushing him, before ramming multiple       vehicles       >>>>>>> to escape.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> Chicago, IL (Oct 2024): A suspect rammed CBP vehicles and attempted to       flee       >>>>>>> before being stopped by a PIT maneuver.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> This wasn't an "attack". This was a woman in the middle of a 3-point       >>>>>> turn who was startled when a masked man came up and grabbed her door.       >>>>>       >>>>> You said it was a U turn? So you really don't know.       >>>>       >>>> I really do know, because I've watched the videos.       >>>       >>> So was it a U Turn or a 3 point turn? Why was she doing it       >>> there? Why didn't she she drive forward?       >>       >> I think it was because she started to turn around to go back the way       >> she'd come, before realizing it was a one way street, and she had to       >> then change back to facing the correct way.       >       > "you think" therein lies the problem. She should have       > already known it was a one way street.              People in stressful situations make mistakes.              >>       >>>>       >>>>>       >>>>> She knew exactly who he was. Why did you ignore the video       >>>>> of her "wife" taunting the agents and telling her to       >>>>> "drive baby drive"?       >>>>       >>>> How is it relevant?       >>>       >>> In court it will be.       >>       >> Nope.       >       > More proof you know nothing about how it works.              LOL!                     >>       >>>>       >>>>>>       >>>>>> And still: the "officer" who you claim was hit could have avoided even       >>>>>> the chance of contact by stepping to the right once.       >>>>>       >>>>> She could still be alive if she didn't try ti interfere       >>>>> with Federal Law Enforcement.       >>>> There is no evidence that she did so.       >>>       >>> Plenty. The video of her bitch wife shows it.       >> The video OF the wife...       >>       >> ...or the video TAKEN by the wife...       >>       >> ...and what does it show?       >       > Intent and the fact that they did know who the agents       > were.              Which has nothing to do with whether she intended to hit the agent...              ...because her actions clearly don't match that intent.              >>       >> How does waving a vehicle through square with your claim she was       >> "interfering"?       >       > You saw the video or did you ignore it?       Answer the question.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca